PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSMB vs. RINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSMB vs. RINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Short Duration Managed Municipal ETF (FSMB) and Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSMB achieves a 1.15% return, which is significantly lower than RINT's 8.39% return.


FSMB

1D
0.05%
1M
0.44%
YTD
1.15%
6M
1.51%
1Y
4.18%
3Y*
3.56%
5Y*
1.51%
10Y*

RINT

1D
-0.77%
1M
3.99%
YTD
8.39%
6M
11.05%
1Y
21.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSMB vs. RINT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FSMB and RINT is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2025

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSMB vs. RINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSMB
FSMB Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FSMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMB Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMB Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

RINT
RINT Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
RINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
RINT Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
RINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
RINT Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSMB vs. RINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Short Duration Managed Municipal ETF (FSMB) and Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSMBRINTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.27

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

1.85

+1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.17

6.94

+4.23

FSMB vs. RINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSMB Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is higher than the RINT Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSMB and RINT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSMBRINTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.99

1.49

+1.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

1.72

-0.97

Drawdowns

FSMB vs. RINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSMB drawdown since its inception was -6.32%, smaller than the maximum RINT drawdown of -11.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMB and RINT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSMBRINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.32%

-11.91%

+5.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.29%

-11.91%

+10.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-0.86%

+0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.16%

-1.82%

+0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.37%

3.16%

-2.79%

Volatility

FSMB vs. RINT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Short Duration Managed Municipal ETF (FSMB) is 0.42%, while Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that FSMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSMBRINTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.42%

4.31%

-3.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.02%

12.36%

-11.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40%

14.79%

-13.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.96%

14.64%

-12.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.92%

14.64%

-11.72%

FSMB vs. RINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSMB has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than RINT's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSMB vs. RINT - Dividend Comparison

FSMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, more than RINT's 0.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FSMB
First Trust Short Duration Managed Municipal ETF
3.14%3.09%2.88%2.40%1.47%1.20%1.79%2.27%0.19%
RINT
Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF
0.82%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSMB and RINT have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RINT has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to FSMB (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMB dropped -6.32% vs RINT's -11.91%.

On 1-year performance, RINT leads with 21.90% vs 4.18% for FSMB. On fees, FSMB is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FSMB has been the lower-risk option at 0.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RINT has performed better with a 21.90% return vs 4.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FSMB is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for RINT.

FSMB has the higher dividend yield at 3.14%, compared with 0.82% for RINT.

FSMB is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while RINT is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Russell. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FSMB and 0.49% for RINT.

FSMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSMB and RINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer