FSLSX vs. TGVOX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FSLSX (Fidelity Value Strategies Fund) and TGVOX (TCW Relative Value Mid Cap Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FSLSX returned 11.42%/yr vs 12.52%/yr for TGVOX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSLSX charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for TGVOX.

Performance

FSLSX vs. TGVOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) and TCW Relative Value Mid Cap Fund (TGVOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSLSX achieves a 21.04% return, which is significantly higher than TGVOX's 18.21% return. Over the past 10 years, FSLSX has underperformed TGVOX with an annualized return of 11.42%, while TGVOX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.52% annualized return.

FSLSX

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 3.49%
• YTD: 21.04%
• 6M: 13.49%
• 1Y: 29.88%
• 3Y*: 15.75%
• 5Y*: 9.07%
• 10Y*: 11.42%

TGVOX

• 1D: 0.95%
• 1M: 1.69%
• YTD: 18.21%
• 6M: 18.97%
• 1Y: 35.99%
• 3Y*: 22.18%
• 5Y*: 10.71%
• 10Y*: 12.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSLSX vs. TGVOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSLSX Fidelity Value Strategies Fund	21.04%	0.24%	9.25%	20.54%	-7.37%	33.32%	8.24%	34.54%	-16.90%	17.49%
TGVOX TCW Relative Value Mid Cap Fund	18.21%	15.53%	17.26%	15.99%	-11.80%	31.99%	3.66%	29.34%	-22.17%	19.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FSLSX and TGVOX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1998	0.91

The correlation between FSLSX and TGVOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FSLSX vs. TGVOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSLSX

FSLSX Risk / Return Rank: 46
FSLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
FSLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FSLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FSLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
FSLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

TGVOX

TGVOX Risk / Return Rank: 77
TGVOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
TGVOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
TGVOX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
TGVOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
TGVOX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSLSX vs. TGVOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) and TCW Relative Value Mid Cap Fund (TGVOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSLSX	TGVOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	2.59	-0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	3.58	-1.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.45	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.32	4.13	-0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.82	15.91	-5.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSLSX vs. TGVOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSLSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the TGVOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSLSX and TGVOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSLSX	TGVOX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73	2.59	-0.86
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.55	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.56	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.44	+0.09

Drawdowns

FSLSX vs. TGVOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSLSX drawdown since its inception was -69.87%, which is greater than TGVOX's maximum drawdown of -58.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLSX and TGVOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSLSX	TGVOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.87%	-58.14%	-11.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.79%	-9.04%	-0.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.81%	-22.69%	-4.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.81%	-23.81%	-3.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.98%	-51.10%	+3.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.28%	-10.30%	+2.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.99%	2.34%	+0.65%

Volatility

FSLSX vs. TGVOX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) has a higher volatility of 4.27% compared to TCW Relative Value Mid Cap Fund (TGVOX) at 4.01%. This indicates that FSLSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TGVOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSLSX	TGVOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.27%	4.01%	+0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.50%	10.88%	+3.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.78%	14.43%	+4.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.50%	19.56%	+0.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.92%	22.30%	-0.38%

FSLSX vs. TGVOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSLSX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than TGVOX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSLSX vs. TGVOX - Dividend Comparison

FSLSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TGVOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.36%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSLSX Fidelity Value Strategies Fund	0.00%	0.00%	10.41%	2.49%	2.13%	7.29%	0.84%	4.84%	14.59%	6.57%	19.71%	1.26%
TGVOX TCW Relative Value Mid Cap Fund	18.36%	21.70%	9.54%	2.34%	2.54%	12.69%	0.75%	2.43%	9.90%	8.25%	0.56%	16.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSLSX and TGVOX in my portfolio?

FSLSX and TGVOX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSLSX or TGVOX?

FSLSX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to TGVOX (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSLSX dropped -69.87% vs TGVOX's -58.14%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TGVOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.