FSLSX vs. HWMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX).
FSLSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 31, 1983. HWMIX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Jan 2, 1997.
Performance
FSLSX vs. HWMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSLSX vs. HWMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSLSX Fidelity Value Strategies Fund | 3.45% | 0.24% | 9.25% | 20.54% | -7.37% | 33.32% | 8.24% | 34.54% | -16.90% | 17.49% |
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 5.14% | 7.87% | 3.62% | 19.87% | 1.63% | 39.18% | 0.49% | 12.97% | -19.32% | 7.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSLSX achieves a 3.45% return, which is significantly lower than HWMIX's 5.14% return. Over the past 10 years, FSLSX has outperformed HWMIX with an annualized return of 10.15%, while HWMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.92% annualized return.
FSLSX
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -8.93%
- YTD
- 3.45%
- 6M
- 0.11%
- 1Y
- 12.54%
- 3Y*
- 10.48%
- 5Y*
- 7.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.15%
HWMIX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -3.40%
- YTD
- 5.14%
- 6M
- 7.65%
- 1Y
- 20.19%
- 3Y*
- 11.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.65%
- 10Y*
- 8.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSLSX vs. HWMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSLSX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than HWMIX's 1.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSLSX vs. HWMIX — Risk / Return Rank
FSLSX
HWMIX
FSLSX vs. HWMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSLSX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.53 | 0.88 | -0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.88 | 1.36 | -0.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.20 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | 1.11 | -0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.58 | 4.53 | -1.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSLSX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 | 0.88 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.43 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.35 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.47 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSLSX and HWMIX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSLSX vs. HWMIX - Dividend Comparison
FSLSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HWMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSLSX Fidelity Value Strategies Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.41% | 2.49% | 2.13% | 7.29% | 0.84% | 4.84% | 14.59% | 6.57% | 19.71% | 1.26% |
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 1.32% | 1.39% | 1.15% | 0.28% | 0.49% | 1.28% | 2.25% | 1.60% | 2.99% | 6.72% | 1.53% | 14.67% |
Drawdowns
FSLSX vs. HWMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSLSX drawdown since its inception was -69.87%, roughly equal to the maximum HWMIX drawdown of -69.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLSX and HWMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSLSX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.87% | -69.84% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.25% | -16.87% | +1.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.81% | -25.90% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.98% | -63.21% | +15.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.79% | -4.77% | -5.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.30% | -10.89% | +2.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.00% | 4.14% | -0.14% |
Volatility
FSLSX vs. HWMIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) at 3.97%. This indicates that FSLSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSLSX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 3.97% | +1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.98% | 12.35% | +2.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.86% | 23.86% | 0.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.43% | 22.33% | -1.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.87% | 25.61% | -3.74% |