FSLSX vs. HAMVX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FSLSX (Fidelity Value Strategies Fund) and HAMVX (Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FSLSX returned 11.42%/yr vs 10.55%/yr for HAMVX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSLSX charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for HAMVX.

Performance

FSLSX vs. HAMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) and Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSLSX achieves a 21.04% return, which is significantly higher than HAMVX's 16.65% return. Over the past 10 years, FSLSX has outperformed HAMVX with an annualized return of 11.42%, while HAMVX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.55% annualized return.

FSLSX

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 3.49%
• YTD: 21.04%
• 6M: 13.49%
• 1Y: 29.88%
• 3Y*: 15.75%
• 5Y*: 9.07%
• 10Y*: 11.42%

HAMVX

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 3.32%
• YTD: 16.65%
• 6M: 17.88%
• 1Y: 35.32%
• 3Y*: 20.77%
• 5Y*: 10.71%
• 10Y*: 10.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSLSX vs. HAMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSLSX Fidelity Value Strategies Fund	21.04%	0.24%	9.25%	20.54%	-7.37%	33.32%	8.24%	34.54%	-16.90%	17.49%
HAMVX Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund	16.65%	16.00%	12.10%	16.42%	-5.63%	29.93%	-3.77%	22.93%	-17.82%	12.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FSLSX and HAMVX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2002	0.94

The correlation between FSLSX and HAMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FSLSX vs. HAMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSLSX

FSLSX Risk / Return Rank: 46
FSLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
FSLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FSLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FSLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
FSLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

HAMVX

HAMVX Risk / Return Rank: 86
HAMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
HAMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
HAMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
HAMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
HAMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSLSX vs. HAMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) and Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSLSX	HAMVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	2.75	-1.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	3.97	-1.67
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.48	-0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.32	5.41	-2.09
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.82	19.16	-8.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSLSX vs. HAMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSLSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the HAMVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSLSX and HAMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSLSX	HAMVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73	2.75	-1.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.57	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.48	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.40	+0.14

Drawdowns

FSLSX vs. HAMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSLSX drawdown since its inception was -69.87%, which is greater than HAMVX's maximum drawdown of -64.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLSX and HAMVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSLSX	HAMVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.87%	-64.17%	-5.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.79%	-6.84%	-2.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.81%	-21.04%	-5.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.81%	-21.04%	-5.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.98%	-51.44%	+3.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.28%	-9.98%	+1.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.99%	1.93%	+1.06%

Volatility

FSLSX vs. HAMVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) has a higher volatility of 4.27% compared to Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX) at 3.24%. This indicates that FSLSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSLSX	HAMVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.27%	3.24%	+1.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.50%	9.24%	+5.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.78%	13.45%	+5.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.50%	18.83%	+1.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.92%	21.90%	+0.02%

FSLSX vs. HAMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSLSX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than HAMVX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSLSX vs. HAMVX - Dividend Comparison

FSLSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HAMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.43%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSLSX Fidelity Value Strategies Fund	0.00%	0.00%	10.41%	2.49%	2.13%	7.29%	0.84%	4.84%	14.59%	6.57%	19.71%	1.26%
HAMVX Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund	7.43%	8.67%	5.77%	7.20%	8.24%	1.27%	2.35%	3.10%	8.41%	3.84%	3.06%	3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSLSX and HAMVX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, FSLSX and HAMVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FSLSX or HAMVX?

FSLSX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to HAMVX (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSLSX dropped -69.87% vs HAMVX's -64.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HAMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.