PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSLSX vs. FSPSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSLSX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSLSX achieves a 24.18% return, which is significantly higher than FSPSX's 10.74% return. Over the past 10 years, FSLSX has outperformed FSPSX with an annualized return of 12.17%, while FSPSX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.29% annualized return.


FSLSX

1D
0.07%
1M
4.51%
YTD
24.18%
6M
13.63%
1Y
30.48%
3Y*
16.84%
5Y*
10.39%
10Y*
12.17%

FSPSX

1D
0.18%
1M
2.11%
YTD
10.74%
6M
10.40%
1Y
24.77%
3Y*
17.73%
5Y*
9.39%
10Y*
10.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSLSX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSLSX
Fidelity Value Strategies Fund
24.18%0.24%9.25%20.54%-7.37%33.32%8.24%34.54%-16.90%17.49%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
10.74%31.98%3.70%18.31%-14.23%11.45%8.16%22.03%-13.55%25.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FSLSX and FSPSX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2011

0.74

The correlation between FSLSX and FSPSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSLSX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSLSX
FSLSX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FSLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FSLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPSX
FSPSX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FSPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSLSX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSLSXFSPSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.31

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

2.26

+0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.48

8.48

+2.00

FSLSX vs. FSPSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSLSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the FSPSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSLSX and FSPSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSLSX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSLSX drawdown since its inception was -69.87%, which is greater than FSPSX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLSX and FSPSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSLSXFSPSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.87%

-33.69%

-36.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.79%

-11.39%

+1.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.81%

-13.58%

-13.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.81%

-29.41%

+2.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.98%

-33.69%

-14.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

0.00%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.27%

-6.53%

-1.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

3.04%

-0.04%

Volatility

FSLSX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) have volatilities of 4.93% and 4.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSLSXFSPSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

4.77%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.80%

12.68%

+2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.10%

15.26%

+3.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.51%

16.07%

+4.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.96%

16.53%

+5.43%

FSLSX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSLSX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSLSX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison

FSLSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSPSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSLSX
Fidelity Value Strategies Fund
0.00%0.00%10.41%2.49%2.13%7.29%0.84%4.84%14.59%6.57%19.71%1.26%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
2.85%3.15%3.27%2.79%2.66%3.07%1.84%3.18%2.79%2.50%3.08%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSLSX and FSPSX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSLSX has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to FSPSX (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSLSX dropped -69.87% vs FSPSX's -33.69%.

FSPSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSLSX and FSPSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer