FSLSX vs. FASPX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FSLSX (Fidelity Value Strategies Fund) and FASPX (Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FSLSX returned 11.42%/yr vs 10.60%/yr for FASPX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FSLSX charges 0.86%/yr vs 1.37%/yr for FASPX.

Performance

FSLSX vs. FASPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FSLSX having a 21.04% return and FASPX slightly lower at 20.76%. Over the past 10 years, FSLSX has outperformed FASPX with an annualized return of 11.42%, while FASPX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.60% annualized return.

FSLSX

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 3.49%
• YTD: 21.04%
• 6M: 13.49%
• 1Y: 29.88%
• 3Y*: 15.75%
• 5Y*: 9.07%
• 10Y*: 11.42%

FASPX

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 3.43%
• YTD: 20.76%
• 6M: 22.32%
• 1Y: 39.62%
• 3Y*: 13.92%
• 5Y*: 7.82%
• 10Y*: 10.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSLSX vs. FASPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSLSX Fidelity Value Strategies Fund	21.04%	0.24%	9.25%	20.54%	-7.37%	33.32%	8.24%	34.54%	-16.90%	17.49%
FASPX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M	20.76%	7.76%	-2.60%	19.93%	-7.82%	32.65%	7.70%	33.85%	-17.27%	17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FSLSX and FASPX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1984	0.97

The correlation between FSLSX and FASPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FSLSX vs. FASPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSLSX

FSLSX Risk / Return Rank: 46
FSLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
FSLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FSLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FSLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
FSLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

FASPX

FASPX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FASPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FASPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FASPX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FASPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FASPX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSLSX vs. FASPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSLSX	FASPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	2.49	-0.76
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	3.52	-1.22
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.42	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.32	4.30	-0.98
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.82	15.87	-5.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSLSX vs. FASPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSLSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the FASPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSLSX and FASPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSLSX	FASPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73	2.49	-0.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.38	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.48	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.41	+0.12

Drawdowns

FSLSX vs. FASPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSLSX drawdown since its inception was -69.87%, roughly equal to the maximum FASPX drawdown of -70.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLSX and FASPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSLSX	FASPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.87%	-70.11%	+0.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.79%	-9.84%	+0.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.81%	-34.53%	+7.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.81%	-34.53%	+7.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.98%	-48.02%	+0.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.28%	-9.83%	+1.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.99%	2.66%	+0.33%

Volatility

FSLSX vs. FASPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX) have volatilities of 4.27% and 4.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSLSX	FASPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.27%	4.27%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.50%	11.92%	+2.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.78%	17.00%	+1.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.50%	20.68%	-0.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.92%	22.01%	-0.09%

FSLSX vs. FASPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSLSX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than FASPX's 1.37% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSLSX vs. FASPX - Dividend Comparison

FSLSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FASPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.72%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FASPX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M	7.72%	9.32%	0.00%	2.40%	1.93%	7.80%	0.55%	4.98%	15.67%	7.26%	21.61%	0.80%
FSLSX Fidelity Value Strategies Fund	0.00%	0.00%	10.41%	2.49%	2.13%	7.29%	0.84%	4.84%	14.59%	6.57%	19.71%	1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSLSX and FASPX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, FSLSX and FASPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FSLSX or FASPX?

FASPX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to FSLSX (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSLSX dropped -69.87% vs FASPX's -70.11%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FASPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.