FSLSX vs. ^GSPC
FSLSX (Fidelity Value Strategies Fund) is Mid Cap Value Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while ^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index. Over the past 10 years, FSLSX returned 11.65%/yr vs 13.61%/yr for ^GSPC. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
FSLSX vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSLSX achieves a 21.92% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 8.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FSLSX has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 11.65%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.61% annualized return.
FSLSX
- 1D
- 2.62%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- YTD
- 21.92%
- 6M
- 11.69%
- 1Y
- 28.40%
- 3Y*
- 15.49%
- 5Y*
- 9.20%
- 10Y*
- 11.65%
^GSPC
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 8.85%
- 1Y
- 22.93%
- 3Y*
- 19.37%
- 5Y*
- 11.84%
- 10Y*
- 13.61%
FSLSX vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSLSX Fidelity Value Strategies Fund | 21.92% | 0.24% | 9.25% | 20.54% | -7.37% | 33.32% | 8.24% | 34.54% | -16.90% | 17.49% |
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 8.56% | 16.39% | 23.31% | 24.23% | -19.44% | 26.89% | 16.26% | 28.88% | -6.24% | 19.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSLSX and ^GSPC is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1983 | 0.81 |
The correlation between FSLSX and ^GSPC shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSLSX vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank
FSLSX
^GSPC
FSLSX vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSLSX | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.34 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 2.53 | +0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.49 | 11.37 | -1.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSLSX vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSLSX drawdown since its inception was -69.87%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLSX and ^GSPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSLSX | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.87% | -56.78% | -13.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.79% | -9.10% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.81% | -18.90% | -7.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.81% | -25.43% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.98% | -33.92% | -14.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -2.34% | +2.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.27% | -10.72% | +2.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 2.02% | +0.98% |
Volatility
FSLSX vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) has a higher volatility of 5.24% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 4.43%. This indicates that FSLSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSLSX | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.24% | 4.43% | +0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.94% | 9.70% | +5.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.04% | 12.38% | +6.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.57% | 16.97% | +3.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.94% | 18.09% | +3.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSLSX and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSLSX has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to ^GSPC (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSLSX dropped -69.87% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.
^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSLSX and ^GSPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer