PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSLR vs. FRDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSLR vs. FRDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) and Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSLR achieves a 2.33% return, which is significantly lower than FRDM's 40.13% return.


FSLR

1D
-1.42%
1M
14.54%
YTD
2.33%
6M
4.91%
1Y
52.57%
3Y*
10.90%
5Y*
27.42%
10Y*
18.76%

FRDM

1D
0.49%
1M
9.04%
YTD
40.13%
6M
46.37%
1Y
87.32%
3Y*
34.29%
5Y*
18.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSLR vs. FRDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FSLR
First Solar, Inc.
2.33%48.22%2.30%15.01%71.86%-11.89%76.77%-5.25%
FRDM
Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF
40.13%61.27%1.70%22.77%-14.45%6.13%16.90%12.23%

Correlation

The correlation between FSLR and FRDM is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2019

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSLR vs. FRDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSLR
FSLR Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FSLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSLR Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FSLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSLR Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

FRDM
FRDM Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FRDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRDM Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FRDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRDM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSLR vs. FRDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) and Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSLRFRDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.54

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

5.02

-3.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.57

19.36

-15.79

FSLR vs. FRDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSLR Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the FRDM Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSLR and FRDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSLR vs. FRDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSLR drawdown since its inception was -96.22%, which is greater than FRDM's maximum drawdown of -40.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLR and FRDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSLRFRDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.22%

-40.49%

-55.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.10%

-16.87%

-18.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.97%

-16.87%

-43.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.97%

-29.25%

-30.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.01%

-4.36%

-11.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.20%

-7.09%

-56.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.63%

4.37%

+12.26%

Volatility

FSLR vs. FRDM - Volatility Comparison

First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) has a higher volatility of 23.37% compared to Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) at 14.27%. This indicates that FSLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSLRFRDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.37%

14.27%

+9.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.98%

24.39%

+17.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.23%

26.86%

+31.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.07%

21.35%

+32.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.84%

23.09%

+27.75%

Dividends

FSLR vs. FRDM - Dividend Comparison

FSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FRDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FRDM
Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF
1.56%2.26%2.53%2.66%2.72%2.17%1.11%1.07%
FSLR
First Solar, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSLR and FRDM have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSLR has higher volatility (23.37%) compared to FRDM (14.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSLR dropped -96.22% vs FRDM's -40.49%.

FRDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSLR and FRDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer