FSLCX vs. FBGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund (FSLCX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX).
FSLCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 12, 1998. FBGRX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 31, 1987.
Performance
FSLCX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSLCX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSLCX Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund | -5.26% | 14.95% | 9.27% | 19.70% | -22.71% | 20.26% | 13.80% | 29.46% | -11.70% | 13.78% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | -11.15% | 19.91% | 39.77% | 55.61% | -38.45% | 22.64% | 62.20% | 33.43% | 1.02% | 36.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSLCX achieves a -5.26% return, which is significantly higher than FBGRX's -11.15% return. Over the past 10 years, FSLCX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 8.19%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.55% annualized return.
FSLCX
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- -9.01%
- YTD
- -5.26%
- 6M
- -3.52%
- 1Y
- 15.27%
- 3Y*
- 11.24%
- 5Y*
- 3.71%
- 10Y*
- 8.19%
FBGRX
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -8.97%
- YTD
- -11.15%
- 6M
- -8.04%
- 1Y
- 22.53%
- 3Y*
- 24.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.15%
- 10Y*
- 18.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSLCX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSLCX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSLCX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank
FSLCX
FBGRX
FSLCX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund (FSLCX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSLCX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.71 | 0.91 | -0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.15 | 1.43 | -0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.20 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 1.36 | -0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.52 | 5.44 | -1.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSLCX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 0.91 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.45 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.79 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.64 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSLCX and FBGRX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSLCX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison
FSLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.74%, more than FBGRX's 2.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSLCX Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund | 15.74% | 14.91% | 1.86% | 0.02% | 7.91% | 22.97% | 0.00% | 0.31% | 26.25% | 8.92% | 3.85% | 10.97% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | 2.14% | 1.90% | 5.95% | 0.93% | 0.57% | 8.73% | 6.40% | 3.70% | 6.32% | 4.23% | 4.05% | 5.30% |
Drawdowns
FSLCX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSLCX drawdown since its inception was -61.22%, roughly equal to the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLCX and FBGRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSLCX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.22% | -58.64% | -2.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.51% | -13.89% | +1.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.04% | -43.08% | +13.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.42% | -43.08% | -2.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.51% | -12.65% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.87% | -12.58% | +2.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.74% | 3.47% | +0.27% |
Volatility
FSLCX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund (FSLCX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) have volatilities of 6.33% and 6.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSLCX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.33% | 6.13% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.82% | 13.36% | -0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.07% | 24.63% | -3.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.77% | 24.86% | -4.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.10% | 23.59% | -2.49% |