FSLBX vs. FSEAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FSLBX (Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio) and FSEAX (Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund) are both mutual funds - FSLBX is a Financials Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FSEAX is a Asia Pacific Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FSLBX returned 13.95%/yr vs 16.15%/yr for FSEAX. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FSLBX charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for FSEAX.

Performance

FSLBX vs. FSEAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio (FSLBX) and Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund (FSEAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSLBX achieves a -13.00% return, which is significantly lower than FSEAX's 39.57% return. Over the past 10 years, FSLBX has underperformed FSEAX with an annualized return of 13.95%, while FSEAX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.15% annualized return.

FSLBX

• 1D: -1.65%
• 1M: -3.06%
• YTD: -13.00%
• 6M: -12.12%
• 1Y: -7.78%
• 3Y*: 16.40%
• 5Y*: 8.42%
• 10Y*: 13.95%

FSEAX

• 1D: 1.71%
• 1M: 12.18%
• YTD: 39.57%
• 6M: 44.64%
• 1Y: 74.85%
• 3Y*: 35.25%
• 5Y*: 8.65%
• 10Y*: 16.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSLBX vs. FSEAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSLBX Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio	-13.00%	5.78%	35.74%	27.77%	-17.54%	40.61%	22.66%	31.60%	-15.37%	27.74%
FSEAX Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund	39.57%	36.43%	21.80%	13.58%	-31.26%	-14.91%	73.43%	30.97%	-15.08%	45.13%

Correlation

The correlation between FSLBX and FSEAX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 1993	0.45

The correlation between FSLBX and FSEAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.52 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FSLBX vs. FSEAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSLBX

FSLBX Risk / Return Rank: 1
FSLBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
FSLBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
FSLBX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
FSLBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
FSLBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

FSEAX

FSEAX Risk / Return Rank: 94
FSEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FSEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
FSEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FSEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FSEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSLBX vs. FSEAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio (FSLBX) and Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund (FSEAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSLBX	FSEAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.35	3.87	-4.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.35	4.61	-4.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.69	-0.73
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.31	5.65	-5.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.65	20.59	-21.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSLBX vs. FSEAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSLBX Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is lower than the FSEAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSLBX and FSEAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSLBX	FSEAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.35	3.87	-4.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	0.38	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	0.77	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.43	+0.02

Drawdowns

FSLBX vs. FSEAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSLBX drawdown since its inception was -68.20%, roughly equal to the maximum FSEAX drawdown of -65.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLBX and FSEAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSLBX	FSEAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.20%	-65.59%	-2.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.67%	-13.42%	-11.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.06%	-17.54%	-8.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.87%	-53.64%	+22.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.56%	-58.07%	+17.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.80%	0.00%	-18.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.87%	-24.68%	+9.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.60%	3.67%	+7.93%

Volatility

FSLBX vs. FSEAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio (FSLBX) is 4.11%, while Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund (FSEAX) has a volatility of 8.45%. This indicates that FSLBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSEAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSLBX	FSEAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.11%	8.45%	-4.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.92%	16.42%	+0.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.33%	19.59%	+1.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.91%	22.86%	+0.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.64%	21.02%	+2.62%

FSLBX vs. FSEAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSLBX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FSEAX's 1.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSLBX vs. FSEAX - Dividend Comparison

FSLBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than FSEAX's 0.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSEAX Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund	0.15%	0.22%	0.00%	0.08%	0.00%	14.14%	14.10%	6.15%	3.44%	0.05%	1.26%	0.44%
FSLBX Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio	2.25%	0.67%	0.69%	1.22%	2.09%	1.39%	3.08%	4.25%	8.94%	5.46%	1.25%	6.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSLBX and FSEAX in my portfolio?

FSLBX and FSEAX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSLBX or FSEAX?

FSEAX has higher volatility (8.45%) compared to FSLBX (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSLBX dropped -68.20% vs FSEAX's -65.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSEAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.87 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.