FSLBX vs. FIKBX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio (FSLBX) and Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z (FIKBX).
FSLBX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 29, 1985. FIKBX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018.
Performance
FSLBX vs. FIKBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSLBX vs. FIKBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSLBX Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio | -16.57% | 5.78% | 35.74% | 27.77% | -17.54% | 40.61% | 22.66% | 31.60% | -8.44% |
FIKBX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z | -9.34% | 15.36% | 32.80% | 14.47% | -8.58% | 33.43% | 0.18% | 34.31% | -11.43% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSLBX achieves a -16.57% return, which is significantly lower than FIKBX's -9.34% return.
FSLBX
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- -4.71%
- YTD
- -16.57%
- 6M
- -16.88%
- 1Y
- -5.82%
- 3Y*
- 14.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.48%
- 10Y*
- 13.45%
FIKBX
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -5.35%
- YTD
- -9.34%
- 6M
- -5.78%
- 1Y
- 4.82%
- 3Y*
- 19.08%
- 5Y*
- 10.36%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSLBX vs. FIKBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSLBX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKBX's 0.64% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSLBX vs. FIKBX — Risk / Return Rank
FSLBX
FIKBX
FSLBX vs. FIKBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio (FSLBX) and Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z (FIKBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSLBX | FIKBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | 0.27 | -0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | 0.50 | -0.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.07 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 0.25 | -0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.51 | 0.77 | -1.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSLBX | FIKBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 | 0.27 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.50 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.46 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSLBX and FIKBX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSLBX vs. FIKBX - Dividend Comparison
FSLBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than FIKBX's 7.85% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSLBX Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio | 0.80% | 0.67% | 0.69% | 1.22% | 2.09% | 1.39% | 3.08% | 4.25% | 8.94% | 5.46% | 1.25% | 6.37% |
FIKBX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z | 7.85% | 7.11% | 5.04% | 2.48% | 6.20% | 4.43% | 2.78% | 1.59% | 4.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FSLBX vs. FIKBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSLBX drawdown since its inception was -68.20%, which is greater than FIKBX's maximum drawdown of -45.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLBX and FIKBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSLBX | FIKBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.20% | -45.95% | -22.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.67% | -14.41% | -10.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.87% | -24.82% | -6.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.14% | -12.09% | -10.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.86% | -8.17% | -6.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.36% | 4.61% | +4.75% |
Volatility
FSLBX vs. FIKBX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio (FSLBX) has a higher volatility of 6.45% compared to Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z (FIKBX) at 4.52%. This indicates that FSLBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIKBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSLBX | FIKBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.45% | 4.52% | +1.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.21% | 12.43% | +4.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.05% | 21.14% | +5.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.77% | 20.79% | +1.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.67% | 26.15% | -2.48% |