PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSIGX vs. NOIEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSIGX vs. NOIEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund (FSIGX) and Northern Income Equity Fund (NOIEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSIGX achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly lower than NOIEX's 12.80% return. Over the past 10 years, FSIGX has underperformed NOIEX with an annualized return of 2.40%, while NOIEX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.02% annualized return.


FSIGX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.47%
YTD
0.57%
6M
0.33%
1Y
5.60%
3Y*
4.63%
5Y*
0.68%
10Y*
2.40%

NOIEX

1D
0.39%
1M
6.04%
YTD
12.80%
6M
13.13%
1Y
30.77%
3Y*
22.92%
5Y*
14.24%
10Y*
14.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSIGX vs. NOIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSIGX
Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund
0.57%7.65%1.79%6.82%-13.30%-0.67%9.71%9.75%-0.15%4.39%
NOIEX
Northern Income Equity Fund
12.80%18.81%24.28%19.56%-13.34%27.96%11.03%27.04%-6.62%20.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FSIGX and NOIEX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2008

-0.12

The correlation between FSIGX and NOIEX shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSIGX vs. NOIEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSIGX
FSIGX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FSIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FSIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

NOIEX
NOIEX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
NOIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
NOIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSIGX vs. NOIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund (FSIGX) and Northern Income Equity Fund (NOIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSIGXNOIEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.51

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

3.85

-1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.53

17.52

-11.98

FSIGX vs. NOIEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSIGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the NOIEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSIGX and NOIEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSIGXNOIEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

2.74

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.88

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.78

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.69

+0.18

Drawdowns

FSIGX vs. NOIEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSIGX drawdown since its inception was -18.22%, smaller than the maximum NOIEX drawdown of -45.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSIGX and NOIEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSIGXNOIEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.22%

-45.66%

+27.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.99%

-8.39%

+5.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.11%

-18.06%

+11.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.22%

-21.89%

+3.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.22%

-35.31%

+17.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

0.00%

-1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.69%

-4.99%

+2.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

1.82%

-0.81%

Volatility

FSIGX vs. NOIEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund (FSIGX) is 1.39%, while Northern Income Equity Fund (NOIEX) has a volatility of 2.73%. This indicates that FSIGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSIGXNOIEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.39%

2.73%

-1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.85%

8.71%

-5.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.07%

11.78%

-7.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.07%

16.36%

-10.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.03%

17.96%

-12.93%

Dividends

FSIGX vs. NOIEX - Dividend Comparison

FSIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, less than NOIEX's 7.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSIGX
Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund
4.28%4.24%4.01%4.00%2.37%1.88%6.32%3.09%3.20%2.86%4.32%3.07%
NOIEX
Northern Income Equity Fund
7.15%7.92%6.11%7.03%5.44%14.26%7.67%8.58%15.73%7.56%3.02%5.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSIGX and NOIEX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOIEX has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to FSIGX (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSIGX dropped -18.22% vs NOIEX's -45.66%.

NOIEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSIGX and NOIEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer