PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSIGX vs. FTIHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSIGX vs. FTIHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund (FSIGX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSIGX achieves a 0.27% return, which is significantly lower than FTIHX's 15.70% return. Over the past 10 years, FSIGX has underperformed FTIHX with an annualized return of 2.33%, while FTIHX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.24% annualized return.


FSIGX

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.67%
YTD
0.27%
6M
0.62%
1Y
4.45%
3Y*
4.46%
5Y*
0.50%
10Y*
2.33%

FTIHX

1D
0.10%
1M
3.19%
YTD
15.70%
6M
15.70%
1Y
33.01%
3Y*
20.01%
5Y*
9.03%
10Y*
10.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSIGX vs. FTIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSIGX
Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund
0.27%7.65%1.79%6.82%-13.30%-0.67%9.71%9.75%-0.15%4.39%
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
15.70%32.59%4.98%15.49%-16.29%8.45%11.09%21.50%-14.40%25.88%

Correlation

The correlation between FSIGX and FTIHX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2016

0.09

Over the past year, FSIGX and FTIHX have become more correlated (0.36) than their long-term average of 0.09, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSIGX vs. FTIHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSIGX
FSIGX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FSIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FSIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

FTIHX
FTIHX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FTIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FTIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSIGX vs. FTIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund (FSIGX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSIGXFTIHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.42

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

3.03

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.32

11.71

-7.39

FSIGX vs. FTIHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSIGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the FTIHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSIGX and FTIHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSIGX vs. FTIHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSIGX drawdown since its inception was -18.22%, smaller than the maximum FTIHX drawdown of -35.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSIGX and FTIHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSIGXFTIHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.22%

-35.75%

+17.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.99%

-11.25%

+8.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.11%

-13.15%

+7.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.22%

-29.99%

+11.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.22%

-35.75%

+17.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.75%

0.00%

-1.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.68%

-7.19%

+4.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.08%

2.90%

-1.82%

Volatility

FSIGX vs. FTIHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund (FSIGX) is 1.15%, while Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) has a volatility of 6.22%. This indicates that FSIGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSIGXFTIHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.15%

6.22%

-5.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.90%

13.22%

-10.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.98%

15.25%

-11.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.08%

15.46%

-9.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.03%

16.09%

-11.06%

Dividends

FSIGX vs. FTIHX - Dividend Comparison

FSIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, more than FTIHX's 2.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSIGX
Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund
4.30%4.24%4.01%4.00%2.37%1.88%6.32%3.09%3.20%2.86%4.32%3.07%
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
2.41%2.78%2.88%2.78%2.51%2.55%1.62%2.61%2.21%0.45%0.47%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSIGX and FTIHX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTIHX has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to FSIGX (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSIGX dropped -18.22% vs FTIHX's -35.75%.

FTIHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSIGX and FTIHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer