FSIGX vs. FIKQX
FSIGX (Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund) and FIKQX (Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z) are both mutual funds - FSIGX is a Investment Grade Bonds fund managed by Fidelity, while FIKQX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FSIGX returned 0.03%/yr vs -0.25%/yr for FIKQX. Their 0.97 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together.
Performance
FSIGX vs. FIKQX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSIGX achieves a -0.48% return, which is significantly higher than FIKQX's -0.54% return.
FSIGX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.19%
- 6M
- -0.73%
- YTD
- -0.48%
- 1Y
- 1.91%
- 3Y*
- 4.14%
- 5Y*
- 0.03%
- 10Y*
- 2.10%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.84%
FIKQX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- 6M
- -0.73%
- YTD
- -0.54%
- 1Y
- 1.70%
- 3Y*
- 4.01%
- 5Y*
- -0.25%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.55%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FSIGX vs. FIKQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSIGX Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund | -0.48% | 7.65% | 1.79% | 6.82% | -13.30% | -0.67% | 9.71% | 9.75% | 1.72% |
FIKQX Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z | -0.54% | 7.31% | 1.69% | 6.75% | -13.97% | -1.03% | 10.00% | 9.90% | 2.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSIGX and FIKQX is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.97 |
The correlation between FSIGX and FIKQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSIGX vs. FIKQX — Risk / Return Rank
FSIGX
FIKQX
FSIGX vs. FIKQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund (FSIGX) and Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z (FIKQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSIGX | FIKQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.14 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | 0.93 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.62 | 2.31 | +0.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSIGX vs. FIKQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSIGX drawdown since its inception was -18.22%, roughly equal to the maximum FIKQX drawdown of -18.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSIGX and FIKQX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSIGX | FIKQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.22% | -18.53% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.99% | -3.13% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.20% | -5.16% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.22% | -18.53% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.48% | -2.49% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.68% | -5.15% | +2.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.22% | 1.26% | -0.04% |
Volatility
FSIGX vs. FIKQX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund (FSIGX) is 1.02%, while Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z (FIKQX) has a volatility of 1.10%. This indicates that FSIGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIKQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSIGX | FIKQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.02% | 1.10% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.03% | 2.95% | +0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.89% | 3.81% | +0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.08% | 6.01% | +0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.03% | 5.45% | -0.42% |
Dividends
FSIGX vs. FIKQX - Dividend Comparison
FSIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, more than FIKQX's 3.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKQX Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z | 3.71% | 3.97% | 4.08% | 3.65% | 2.05% | 1.44% | 4.90% | 2.83% | 1.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSIGX Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund | 3.97% | 4.24% | 4.01% | 4.00% | 2.37% | 1.88% | 6.32% | 3.09% | 3.20% | 2.86% | 4.32% | 3.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, FSIGX and FIKQX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FIKQX has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to FSIGX (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSIGX dropped -18.22% vs FIKQX's -18.53%.
FSIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSIGX and FIKQX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer