FSIG vs. SLDR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FSIG (First Trust Limited Duration Investment Grade Corporate ETF) and SLDR (Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSIG is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by First Trust, while SLDR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE US Treasury 1-3 Years Laddered Bond Index. FSIG is actively managed, while SLDR is passively managed. Over the past year, FSIG returned 4.26% vs 3.14% for SLDR. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSIG charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SLDR.

Performance

FSIG vs. SLDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Limited Duration Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FSIG) and Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF (SLDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSIG achieves a 0.38% return, which is significantly higher than SLDR's 0.31% return.

FSIG

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 0.38%
• 6M: 0.81%
• 1Y: 4.26%
• 3Y*: 5.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SLDR

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 0.31%
• 6M: 0.69%
• 1Y: 3.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSIG vs. SLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FSIG First Trust Limited Duration Investment Grade Corporate ETF	0.38%	6.66%	-0.47%
SLDR Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF	0.31%	4.60%	0.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FSIG and SLDR is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2024	0.64

The correlation between FSIG and SLDR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FSIG vs. SLDR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSIG

FSIG Risk / Return Rank: 60
FSIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
FSIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
FSIG Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FSIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
FSIG Martin Ratio Rank: 63

SLDR

SLDR Risk / Return Rank: 81
SLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
SLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
SLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 92
SLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
SLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSIG vs. SLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Limited Duration Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FSIG) and Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF (SLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSIG	SLDR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	2.51	-0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	4.03	-1.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.62	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.75	3.61	-0.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.44	13.93	-2.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSIG vs. SLDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the SLDR Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSIG and SLDR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSIG	SLDR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.89	2.51	-0.62
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.95	2.58	-1.63

Drawdowns

FSIG vs. SLDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSIG drawdown since its inception was -6.88%, which is greater than SLDR's maximum drawdown of -0.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSIG and SLDR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSIG	SLDR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.88%	-0.87%	-6.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.55%	-0.87%	-0.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.32%	-0.28%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.67%	-0.14%	-1.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.37%	0.23%	+0.14%

Volatility

FSIG vs. SLDR - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Limited Duration Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FSIG) has a higher volatility of 0.83% compared to Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF (SLDR) at 0.37%. This indicates that FSIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSIG	SLDR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.83%	0.37%	+0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.81%	0.78%	+1.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.26%	1.25%	+1.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.96%	1.24%	+1.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.96%	1.24%	+1.72%

FSIG vs. SLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSIG has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SLDR's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSIG vs. SLDR - Dividend Comparison

FSIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%, more than SLDR's 3.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FSIG First Trust Limited Duration Investment Grade Corporate ETF	4.81%	4.73%	4.61%	4.42%	2.48%	0.12%
SLDR Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF	3.72%	3.80%	0.98%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSIG and SLDR in my portfolio?

FSIG and SLDR have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSIG or SLDR?

FSIG has higher volatility (0.83%) compared to SLDR (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSIG dropped -6.88% vs SLDR's -0.87%.

Which ETF is better, FSIG or SLDR?

On 1-year performance, FSIG leads with 4.26% vs 3.14% for SLDR. On fees, SLDR is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, SLDR has been the lower-risk option at 0.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FSIG or SLDR?

Over the 1-year period, FSIG has performed better with a 4.26% return vs 3.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FSIG or SLDR?

SLDR is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FSIG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FSIG or SLDR?

FSIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.81%, compared with 3.72% for SLDR.

What is the main difference between FSIG and SLDR?

FSIG is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while SLDR is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FSIG and 0.12% for SLDR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.