FSHOX vs. FSAVX
FSHOX (Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio) and FSAVX (Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FSHOX returned 14.26%/yr vs 10.56%/yr for FSAVX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSHOX charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for FSAVX.
Performance
FSHOX vs. FSAVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSHOX achieves a 6.72% return, which is significantly higher than FSAVX's -5.41% return. Over the past 10 years, FSHOX has outperformed FSAVX with an annualized return of 14.26%, while FSAVX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.56% annualized return.
FSHOX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- 6M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 6.72%
- 1Y
- 7.93%
- 3Y*
- 12.24%
- 5Y*
- 10.00%
- 10Y*
- 14.26%
FSAVX
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- 6M
- -9.43%
- YTD
- -5.41%
- 1Y
- -3.35%
- 3Y*
- 2.44%
- 5Y*
- -0.16%
- 10Y*
- 10.56%
FSHOX vs. FSAVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSHOX Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio | 6.72% | 5.24% | 15.28% | 30.85% | -22.76% | 57.51% | 25.95% | 41.15% | -15.87% | 26.25% |
FSAVX Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio | -5.41% | 8.01% | 6.15% | 32.55% | -37.45% | 28.99% | 63.22% | 28.87% | -13.78% | 24.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSHOX and FSAVX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 1986 | 0.72 |
The correlation between FSHOX and FSAVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSHOX vs. FSAVX — Risk / Return Rank
FSHOX
FSAVX
FSHOX vs. FSAVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio (FSHOX) and Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio (FSAVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSHOX | FSAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.99 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | -0.20 | +0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.08 | -0.42 | +1.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSHOX vs. FSAVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSHOX drawdown since its inception was -61.68%, smaller than the maximum FSAVX drawdown of -81.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSHOX and FSAVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSHOX | FSAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.68% | -81.27% | +19.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.54% | -19.11% | +2.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.76% | -19.11% | -5.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.23% | -41.86% | +8.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.67% | -43.28% | -0.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.98% | -14.63% | +6.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.83% | -13.37% | +3.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.68% | 9.00% | -2.32% |
Volatility
FSHOX vs. FSAVX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio (FSHOX) has a higher volatility of 8.15% compared to Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio (FSAVX) at 6.10%. This indicates that FSHOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSAVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSHOX | FSAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.15% | 6.10% | +2.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.33% | 15.17% | +2.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.08% | 20.68% | +0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.95% | 23.83% | -1.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.56% | 23.87% | -1.31% |
FSHOX vs. FSAVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSHOX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than FSAVX's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSHOX vs. FSAVX - Dividend Comparison
FSHOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.04%, which matches FSAVX's 6.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSAVX Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio | 6.00% | 0.00% | 0.85% | 0.86% | 2.61% | 2.58% | 8.57% | 4.08% | 7.97% | 15.51% | 7.13% | 16.06% |
FSHOX Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio | 6.04% | 3.91% | 4.05% | 0.82% | 0.80% | 5.45% | 4.73% | 7.91% | 15.47% | 13.62% | 3.61% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSHOX and FSAVX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSHOX has higher volatility (8.15%) compared to FSAVX (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSHOX dropped -61.68% vs FSAVX's -81.27%.
FSHOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.34 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSHOX and FSAVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer