PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSGGX vs. FSOSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSGGX vs. FSOSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX) and Fidelity Series Overseas Fund (FSOSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSGGX achieves a 13.72% return, which is significantly higher than FSOSX's 5.96% return.


FSGGX

1D
0.05%
1M
0.38%
6M
7.28%
YTD
13.72%
1Y
29.14%
3Y*
17.70%
5Y*
9.21%
10Y*
9.11%
ALL TIME*
7.68%

FSOSX

1D
0.06%
1M
-1.37%
6M
1.35%
YTD
5.96%
1Y
10.72%
3Y*
12.52%
5Y*
5.79%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FSGGX vs. FSOSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FSGGX
Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund
13.72%32.93%5.30%15.57%-15.75%7.74%10.73%7.29%
FSOSX
Fidelity Series Overseas Fund
5.96%21.29%5.87%21.49%-23.25%19.59%16.36%7.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FSGGX and FSOSX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019

0.92

The correlation between FSGGX and FSOSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSGGX vs. FSOSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSGGX
FSGGX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FSGGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSGGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSGGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FSGGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSGGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

FSOSX
FSOSX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
FSOSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSOSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSOSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
FSOSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSOSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSGGX vs. FSOSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX) and Fidelity Series Overseas Fund (FSOSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSGGXFSOSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.11

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

0.78

+1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.48

2.66

+6.82

FSGGX vs. FSOSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSGGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the FSOSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSGGX and FSOSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSGGX vs. FSOSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSGGX drawdown since its inception was -34.76%, roughly equal to the maximum FSOSX drawdown of -35.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSGGX and FSOSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSGGXFSOSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.76%

-35.36%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.26%

-12.39%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.31%

-14.07%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.53%

-35.36%

+5.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.30%

-3.48%

+1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.29%

-7.67%

+0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

3.64%

-0.61%

Volatility

FSGGX vs. FSOSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX) is 5.21%, while Fidelity Series Overseas Fund (FSOSX) has a volatility of 6.03%. This indicates that FSGGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSOSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSGGXFSOSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

6.03%

-0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.57%

16.57%

-2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.40%

18.58%

-2.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.70%

18.05%

-2.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.10%

19.15%

-3.05%

FSGGX vs. FSOSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSGGX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than FSOSX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSGGX vs. FSOSX - Dividend Comparison

FSGGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, less than FSOSX's 8.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSGGX
Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund
2.38%2.70%2.91%2.95%2.64%2.60%1.71%2.85%2.66%0.22%0.05%2.44%
FSOSX
Fidelity Series Overseas Fund
8.63%9.15%2.25%1.63%1.80%2.92%1.12%0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FSGGX and FSOSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSOSX has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to FSGGX (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSGGX dropped -34.76% vs FSOSX's -35.36%.

FSGGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSGGX and FSOSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer