FSFHX vs. PYHRX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FSFHX (Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class I) and PYHRX (Payden High Income Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, FSFHX returned 4.60%/yr vs 6.15%/yr for PYHRX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSFHX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PYHRX.

Performance

FSFHX vs. PYHRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class I (FSFHX) and Payden High Income Fund (PYHRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSFHX achieves a 3.07% return, which is significantly higher than PYHRX's 2.36% return. Over the past 10 years, FSFHX has underperformed PYHRX with an annualized return of 4.60%, while PYHRX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.15% annualized return.

FSFHX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.83%
• YTD: 3.07%
• 6M: 3.60%
• 1Y: 8.89%
• 3Y*: 8.51%
• 5Y*: 4.38%
• 10Y*: 4.60%

PYHRX

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 2.36%
• 6M: 3.11%
• 1Y: 9.03%
• 3Y*: 9.63%
• 5Y*: 5.08%
• 10Y*: 6.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSFHX vs. PYHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSFHX Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class I	3.07%	7.72%	7.72%	10.28%	-7.42%	3.06%	3.98%	9.32%	-1.24%	4.95%
PYHRX Payden High Income Fund	2.36%	8.73%	8.13%	14.73%	-9.76%	6.62%	7.38%	16.75%	-2.85%	6.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FSFHX and PYHRX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2013	0.77

The correlation between FSFHX and PYHRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FSFHX vs. PYHRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSFHX

FSFHX Risk / Return Rank: 95
FSFHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FSFHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
FSFHX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
FSFHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FSFHX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

PYHRX

PYHRX Risk / Return Rank: 95
PYHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
PYHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
PYHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
PYHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
PYHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSFHX vs. PYHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class I (FSFHX) and Payden High Income Fund (PYHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSFHX	PYHRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.16	3.76	-0.60
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	6.04	5.91	+0.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.81	1.89	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.49	4.56	+0.93
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	28.13	24.63	+3.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSFHX vs. PYHRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSFHX Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is comparable to the PYHRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSFHX and PYHRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSFHX	PYHRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.16	3.76	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.15	0.10	+1.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.09	0.17	+0.92
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.93	0.26	+0.67

Drawdowns

FSFHX vs. PYHRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSFHX drawdown since its inception was -16.77%, smaller than the maximum PYHRX drawdown of -50.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSFHX and PYHRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSFHX	PYHRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.77%	-50.79%	+34.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.67%	-2.02%	+0.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.30%	-50.79%	+47.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.43%	-50.79%	+41.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-16.77%	-50.79%	+34.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.55%	-2.12%	+0.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.33%	0.37%	-0.04%

Volatility

FSFHX vs. PYHRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class I (FSFHX) has a higher volatility of 0.82% compared to Payden High Income Fund (PYHRX) at 0.75%. This indicates that FSFHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYHRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSFHX	PYHRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.82%	0.75%	+0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.23%	1.96%	+0.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.90%	2.46%	+0.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.83%	51.06%	-47.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.24%	36.29%	-32.05%

FSFHX vs. PYHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSFHX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PYHRX's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSFHX vs. PYHRX - Dividend Comparison

FSFHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.26%, more than PYHRX's 6.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSFHX Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class I	7.26%	7.34%	6.06%	5.96%	2.86%	3.12%	3.47%	4.22%	4.52%	4.10%	5.29%	4.40%
PYHRX Payden High Income Fund	6.42%	6.81%	7.20%	6.67%	6.05%	4.79%	4.99%	5.23%	5.88%	5.27%	5.24%	5.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSFHX and PYHRX in my portfolio?

FSFHX and PYHRX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSFHX or PYHRX?

FSFHX has higher volatility (0.82%) compared to PYHRX (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSFHX dropped -16.77% vs PYHRX's -50.79%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PYHRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs 3.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.