PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSFHX vs. SCFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSFHX vs. SCFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class I (FSFHX) and Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSFHX achieves a 3.07% return, which is significantly higher than SCFIX's 1.32% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSFHX having a 4.60% annualized return and SCFIX not far behind at 4.38%.


FSFHX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.72%
YTD
3.07%
6M
3.71%
1Y
9.13%
3Y*
8.51%
5Y*
4.38%
10Y*
4.60%

SCFIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.32%
6M
1.92%
1Y
5.34%
3Y*
6.61%
5Y*
4.47%
10Y*
4.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSFHX vs. SCFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSFHX
Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class I
3.07%7.72%7.72%10.28%-7.42%3.06%3.98%9.32%-1.24%4.95%
SCFIX
Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund
1.32%7.02%6.11%9.24%-2.52%5.08%3.36%7.61%0.85%3.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FSFHX and SCFIX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2013

0.73

The correlation between FSFHX and SCFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSFHX vs. SCFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSFHX
FSFHX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FSFHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSFHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSFHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FSFHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSFHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

SCFIX
SCFIX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SCFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
SCFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSFHX vs. SCFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class I (FSFHX) and Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSFHXSCFIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.16

3.36

-0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

6.04

5.51

+0.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.81

1.83

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.73

4.85

+0.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

29.40

26.30

+3.10

FSFHX vs. SCFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSFHX Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is comparable to the SCFIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSFHX and SCFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSFHXSCFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.16

3.36

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.15

1.62

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.09

1.34

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

1.33

-0.41

Drawdowns

FSFHX vs. SCFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSFHX drawdown since its inception was -16.77%, which is greater than SCFIX's maximum drawdown of -13.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSFHX and SCFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSFHXSCFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.77%

-13.08%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.67%

-1.11%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.30%

-1.72%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.43%

-6.30%

-3.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.77%

-13.08%

-3.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.55%

-0.51%

-1.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.33%

0.21%

+0.12%

Volatility

FSFHX vs. SCFIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class I (FSFHX) has a higher volatility of 0.82% compared to Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund (SCFIX) at 0.50%. This indicates that FSFHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSFHXSCFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.82%

0.50%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.30%

1.29%

+1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.90%

1.63%

+1.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.83%

2.77%

+1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.24%

3.28%

+0.96%

FSFHX vs. SCFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSFHX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SCFIX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSFHX vs. SCFIX - Dividend Comparison

FSFHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.26%, more than SCFIX's 5.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSFHX
Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class I
7.26%7.34%6.06%5.96%2.86%3.12%3.47%4.22%4.52%4.10%5.29%4.40%
SCFIX
Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund
5.33%5.54%5.85%5.21%3.86%4.93%3.24%3.78%3.87%3.09%3.07%3.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSFHX and SCFIX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSFHX has higher volatility (0.82%) compared to SCFIX (0.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSFHX dropped -16.77% vs SCFIX's -13.08%.

SCFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 3.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSFHX and SCFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer