FSF.TO vs. CEQP.TO

Last updated Jul 1, 2026

FSF.TO (CI Global Financial Sector ETF) and CEQP.TO (CI Equity+ Asset Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSF.TO is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by CI, while CEQP.TO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by CI. Both are actively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FSF.TO vs. CEQP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Global Financial Sector ETF (FSF.TO) and CI Equity+ Asset Allocation ETF (CEQP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FSF.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 5.48%
• YTD: 2.28%
• 6M: 2.00%
• 1Y: 13.30%
• 3Y*: 22.27%
• 5Y*: 11.37%
• 10Y*: 21.70%

CEQP.TO

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSF.TO vs. CEQP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FSF.TO CI Global Financial Sector ETF	2.59%
CEQP.TO CI Equity+ Asset Allocation ETF	6.65%

Correlation

The correlation between FSF.TO and CEQP.TO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2026	0.32

Return for Risk

FSF.TO vs. CEQP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSF.TO

FSF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 25
FSF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
FSF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
FSF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 28
FSF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
FSF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 23

CEQP.TO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSF.TO vs. CEQP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Global Financial Sector ETF (FSF.TO) and CI Equity+ Asset Allocation ETF (CEQP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSF.TO	CEQP.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.30	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.89	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.61	—	—

Drawdowns

FSF.TO vs. CEQP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSF.TO drawdown since its inception was -73.78%, which is greater than CEQP.TO's maximum drawdown of -8.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSF.TO and CEQP.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSF.TO	CEQP.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.78%	-8.33%	-65.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.09%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.26%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.08%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.76%	-1.17%	-0.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.28%	-1.79%	-14.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.12%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FSF.TO	CEQP.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.41%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.90%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.54%	16.82%	-1.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.34%	16.82%	+2.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	212.69%	16.82%	+195.87%

Dividends

FSF.TO vs. CEQP.TO - Dividend Comparison

FSF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than CEQP.TO's 0.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CEQP.TO CI Equity+ Asset Allocation ETF	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FSF.TO CI Global Financial Sector ETF	1.43%	1.28%	1.41%	2.10%	2.35%	0.74%	1.28%	1.91%	2.30%	0.96%	0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSF.TO and CEQP.TO in my portfolio?

FSF.TO and CEQP.TO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between FSF.TO and CEQP.TO?

FSF.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while CEQP.TO is Diversified Portfolio.