PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSEP vs. ISWN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FSEP vs. ISWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (FSEP) and Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FSEP vs. ISWN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FSEP
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September
-2.39%12.83%13.56%20.23%-7.05%11.03%
ISWN
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
0.94%23.23%-3.96%8.19%-24.93%0.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSEP achieves a -2.39% return, which is significantly lower than ISWN's 0.94% return.


FSEP

1D
2.14%
1M
-2.97%
YTD
-2.39%
6M
-0.42%
1Y
12.97%
3Y*
12.49%
5Y*
8.58%
10Y*

ISWN

1D
2.06%
1M
-6.89%
YTD
0.94%
6M
3.42%
1Y
15.90%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
-0.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FSEP vs. ISWN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSEP has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ISWN's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FSEP vs. ISWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSEP
FSEP Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

ISWN
ISWN Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ISWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISWN Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ISWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISWN Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSEP vs. ISWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (FSEP) and Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSEPISWNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.08

1.35

-0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.60

1.86

-0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.24

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

1.61

+0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.32

6.68

+1.64

FSEP vs. ISWN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is comparable to the ISWN Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSEP and ISWN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSEPISWNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

1.35

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

-0.00

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

-0.04

+1.00

Correlation

The correlation between FSEP and ISWN is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FSEP vs. ISWN - Dividend Comparison

FSEP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%.


TTM20252024202320222021
FSEP
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISWN
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
2.91%2.89%3.27%2.91%2.00%0.76%

Drawdowns

FSEP vs. ISWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSEP drawdown since its inception was -13.79%, smaller than the maximum ISWN drawdown of -32.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSEP and ISWN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FSEPISWNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.79%

-32.35%

+18.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.16%

-9.63%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.79%

-32.35%

+18.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.60%

-7.11%

+3.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.19%

-16.57%

+14.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

2.32%

-0.72%

Volatility

FSEP vs. ISWN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (FSEP) is 3.75%, while Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) has a volatility of 6.13%. This indicates that FSEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FSEPISWNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

6.13%

-2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.13%

8.60%

-2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.12%

11.81%

+0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.75%

11.47%

-0.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.64%

11.40%

-0.76%