PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGLS.L vs. FUSS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FGLS.L vs. FUSS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FGLS.L) and Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced US Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FUSS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FGLS.L vs. FUSS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FGLS.L
Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity UCITS ETF Acc
-4.09%10.06%19.92%17.58%-9.61%23.93%12.54%
FUSS.L
Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced US Equity UCITS ETF Acc
-3.49%9.84%28.34%22.30%-11.83%28.45%13.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGLS.L achieves a -4.09% return, which is significantly lower than FUSS.L's -3.49% return.


FGLS.L

1D
0.72%
1M
-5.20%
YTD
-4.09%
6M
-0.82%
1Y
12.58%
3Y*
12.33%
5Y*
9.75%
10Y*

FUSS.L

1D
1.58%
1M
-3.41%
YTD
-3.49%
6M
-0.13%
1Y
16.20%
3Y*
16.58%
5Y*
12.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FGLS.L vs. FUSS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGLS.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FUSS.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FGLS.L vs. FUSS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGLS.L
FGLS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FGLS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGLS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGLS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
FGLS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGLS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FUSS.L
FUSS.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FUSS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUSS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUSS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
FUSS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUSS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGLS.L vs. FUSS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FGLS.L) and Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced US Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FUSS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGLS.LFUSS.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.96

0.99

-0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.39

1.45

-0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.20

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

1.95

-0.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.08

6.58

-1.51

FGLS.L vs. FUSS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGLS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the FUSS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGLS.L and FUSS.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGLS.LFUSS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

0.99

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.84

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.91

-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between FGLS.L and FUSS.L is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FGLS.L vs. FUSS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FGLS.L nor FUSS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FGLS.L vs. FUSS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGLS.L drawdown since its inception was -19.90%, smaller than the maximum FUSS.L drawdown of -22.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGLS.L and FUSS.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FGLS.LFUSS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.90%

-22.18%

+2.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.51%

-10.84%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.90%

-22.18%

+2.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.09%

-5.64%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.23%

-3.70%

+0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

2.44%

+0.04%

Volatility

FGLS.L vs. FUSS.L - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced Global Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FGLS.L) and Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced US Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FUSS.L) have volatilities of 3.96% and 3.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FGLS.LFUSS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.96%

3.82%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.17%

8.96%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.48%

16.43%

-1.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.43%

14.89%

-1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.81%

15.30%

-1.49%