PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSEC vs. HTAB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FSEC vs. HTAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF (FSEC) and Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FSEC vs. HTAB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FSEC
Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF
0.46%8.33%2.40%5.22%-12.62%-0.49%
HTAB
Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF
0.51%2.86%1.52%7.16%-8.33%0.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSEC achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly lower than HTAB's 0.51% return.


FSEC

1D
0.19%
1M
-1.15%
YTD
0.46%
6M
1.64%
1Y
4.79%
3Y*
4.61%
5Y*
0.48%
10Y*

HTAB

1D
0.37%
1M
-1.58%
YTD
0.51%
6M
1.51%
1Y
3.32%
3Y*
2.76%
5Y*
0.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FSEC vs. HTAB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSEC has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than HTAB's 0.39% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FSEC vs. HTAB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSEC
FSEC Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FSEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSEC Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FSEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSEC Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

HTAB
HTAB Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
HTAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTAB Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
HTAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTAB Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSEC vs. HTAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF (FSEC) and Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSECHTABDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.75

0.59

+0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.09

0.81

+0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.13

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

0.77

+0.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.65

1.92

+1.73

FSEC vs. HTAB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSEC Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is comparable to the HTAB Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSEC and HTAB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSECHTABDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

0.59

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.12

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.42

-0.37

Correlation

The correlation between FSEC and HTAB is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FSEC vs. HTAB - Dividend Comparison

FSEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than HTAB's 3.92% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FSEC
Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF
4.43%4.22%3.22%3.41%2.21%0.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HTAB
Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF
3.92%3.88%3.57%3.21%2.26%2.18%1.64%2.77%1.61%

Drawdowns

FSEC vs. HTAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSEC drawdown since its inception was -17.97%, which is greater than HTAB's maximum drawdown of -14.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSEC and HTAB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FSECHTABDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.97%

-14.76%

-3.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.08%

-4.51%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.97%

-14.76%

-3.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

-1.81%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.81%

-2.93%

-3.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

1.81%

-0.31%

Volatility

FSEC vs. HTAB - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF (FSEC) has a higher volatility of 1.90% compared to Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB) at 1.69%. This indicates that FSEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FSECHTABDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.90%

1.69%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.38%

2.57%

+0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.42%

5.66%

+0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.72%

5.70%

+1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.68%

5.19%

+1.49%