PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSEC vs. FBTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSEC vs. FBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF (FSEC) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSEC achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly higher than FBTC's -23.31% return.


FSEC

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.97%
6M
1.42%
1Y
7.15%
3Y*
4.89%
5Y*
0.57%
10Y*

FBTC

1D
-6.01%
1M
-14.41%
YTD
-23.31%
6M
-26.33%
1Y
-35.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSEC vs. FBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FSEC
Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF
0.97%8.33%2.56%
FBTC
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund
-23.31%-6.56%99.56%

Correlation

The correlation between FSEC and FBTC is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSEC vs. FBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSEC
FSEC Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FSEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSEC Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FSEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSEC Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

FBTC
FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSEC vs. FBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF (FSEC) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSECFBTCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.35

-0.83

+2.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.04

-1.09

+3.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.88

+0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

-0.73

+3.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.56

-1.28

+8.83

FSEC vs. FBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the FBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSEC and FBTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSECFBTCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

-0.83

+2.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.32

-0.25

Drawdowns

FSEC vs. FBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSEC drawdown since its inception was -17.97%, smaller than the maximum FBTC drawdown of -49.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSEC and FBTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSECFBTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.97%

-49.33%

+31.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.52%

-49.33%

+46.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

-46.58%

+45.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.64%

-15.95%

+9.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

28.24%

-27.36%

Volatility

FSEC vs. FBTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF (FSEC) is 1.51%, while Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) has a volatility of 9.67%. This indicates that FSEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSECFBTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.51%

9.67%

-8.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.11%

34.77%

-31.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.35%

43.53%

-38.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.76%

50.14%

-43.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.61%

50.14%

-43.53%

FSEC vs. FBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSEC has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than FBTC's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSEC vs. FBTC - Dividend Comparison

FSEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, while FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FBTC
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSEC
Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF
4.44%4.22%3.22%3.41%2.21%0.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSEC and FBTC have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBTC has higher volatility (9.67%) compared to FSEC (1.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSEC dropped -17.97% vs FBTC's -49.33%.

On 1-year performance, FSEC leads with 7.15% vs -35.90% for FBTC. On fees, FBTC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FSEC has been the lower-risk option at 1.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FSEC has performed better with a 7.15% return vs -35.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FBTC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FSEC.

FSEC has the higher dividend yield at 4.44%, compared with 0.00% for FBTC.

FSEC is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while FBTC is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for FSEC and 0.25% for FBTC.

FSEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSEC and FBTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer