FSEAX vs. MEMQX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FSEAX (Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund) and MEMQX (Mercer Emerging Markets Equity Fund) are both mutual funds - FSEAX is a Asia Pacific Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while MEMQX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Mercer Funds. Over the past 5 years, FSEAX returned 8.65%/yr vs 4.89%/yr for MEMQX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSEAX charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for MEMQX.

Performance

FSEAX vs. MEMQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund (FSEAX) and Mercer Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEMQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSEAX achieves a 39.57% return, which is significantly higher than MEMQX's 28.05% return.

FSEAX

• 1D: 1.71%
• 1M: 12.18%
• YTD: 39.57%
• 6M: 44.64%
• 1Y: 74.85%
• 3Y*: 35.25%
• 5Y*: 8.65%
• 10Y*: 16.15%

MEMQX

• 1D: 0.99%
• 1M: 8.77%
• YTD: 28.05%
• 6M: 30.97%
• 1Y: 52.82%
• 3Y*: 20.60%
• 5Y*: 4.89%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSEAX vs. MEMQX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FSEAX Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund	39.57%	36.43%	21.80%	13.58%	-31.26%	-14.91%	73.43%	15.15%
MEMQX Mercer Emerging Markets Equity Fund	28.05%	31.07%	2.00%	7.16%	-24.30%	0.23%	13.55%	7.56%

Correlation

The correlation between FSEAX and MEMQX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2019	0.79

The correlation between FSEAX and MEMQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FSEAX vs. MEMQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSEAX

FSEAX Risk / Return Rank: 94
FSEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FSEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
FSEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FSEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FSEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

MEMQX

MEMQX Risk / Return Rank: 93
MEMQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
MEMQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
MEMQX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
MEMQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
MEMQX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSEAX vs. MEMQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund (FSEAX) and Mercer Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEMQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSEAX	MEMQX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.87	3.82	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.61	4.87	-0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.69	1.70	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.65	5.08	+0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.59	18.55	+2.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSEAX vs. MEMQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSEAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.87, which is comparable to the MEMQX Sharpe Ratio of 3.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSEAX and MEMQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSEAX	MEMQX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.87	3.82	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	0.28	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.41	+0.02

Drawdowns

FSEAX vs. MEMQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSEAX drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, which is greater than MEMQX's maximum drawdown of -40.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSEAX and MEMQX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSEAX	MEMQX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.59%	-40.09%	-25.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.42%	-12.37%	-1.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.54%	-16.89%	-0.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.64%	-39.37%	-14.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.68%	-17.12%	-7.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.67%	3.19%	+0.48%

Volatility

FSEAX vs. MEMQX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund (FSEAX) has a higher volatility of 8.45% compared to Mercer Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEMQX) at 6.31%. This indicates that FSEAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEMQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSEAX	MEMQX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.45%	6.31%	+2.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.42%	13.64%	+2.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.59%	16.53%	+3.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.86%	18.16%	+4.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.02%	19.63%	+1.39%

FSEAX vs. MEMQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSEAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than MEMQX's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSEAX vs. MEMQX - Dividend Comparison

FSEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than MEMQX's 2.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSEAX Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund	0.15%	0.22%	0.00%	0.08%	0.00%	14.14%	14.10%	6.15%	3.44%	0.05%	1.26%	0.44%
MEMQX Mercer Emerging Markets Equity Fund	2.25%	2.88%	1.64%	2.35%	2.57%	13.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSEAX and MEMQX in my portfolio?

FSEAX and MEMQX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSEAX or MEMQX?

FSEAX has higher volatility (8.45%) compared to MEMQX (6.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSEAX dropped -65.59% vs MEMQX's -40.09%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSEAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.87 vs 3.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.