FSEAX vs. FBALX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund (FSEAX) and Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX).
FSEAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 19, 1993. FBALX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 6, 1986.
Performance
FSEAX vs. FBALX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSEAX vs. FBALX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSEAX Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund | 3.41% | 36.43% | 21.80% | 13.58% | -31.26% | -14.91% | 73.43% | 30.97% | -15.08% | 45.13% |
FBALX Fidelity Balanced Fund | -1.74% | 15.11% | 16.09% | 20.31% | -18.29% | 18.27% | 22.45% | 24.40% | -3.98% | 16.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSEAX achieves a 3.41% return, which is significantly higher than FBALX's -1.74% return. Over the past 10 years, FSEAX has outperformed FBALX with an annualized return of 12.74%, while FBALX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.73% annualized return.
FSEAX
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- -9.27%
- YTD
- 3.41%
- 6M
- 3.75%
- 1Y
- 35.92%
- 3Y*
- 21.91%
- 5Y*
- 2.22%
- 10Y*
- 12.74%
FBALX
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- -3.87%
- YTD
- -1.74%
- 6M
- 0.80%
- 1Y
- 15.76%
- 3Y*
- 13.67%
- 5Y*
- 7.65%
- 10Y*
- 10.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSEAX vs. FBALX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSEAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than FBALX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSEAX vs. FBALX — Risk / Return Rank
FSEAX
FBALX
FSEAX vs. FBALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund (FSEAX) and Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSEAX | FBALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.84 | 1.37 | +0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.41 | 1.99 | +0.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.30 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | 2.05 | +0.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.56 | 9.47 | +0.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSEAX | FBALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 1.37 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.63 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.84 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.79 | -0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSEAX and FBALX is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FSEAX vs. FBALX - Dividend Comparison
FSEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than FBALX's 5.79% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSEAX Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 14.14% | 14.10% | 6.15% | 3.44% | 0.05% | 1.26% | 0.44% |
FBALX Fidelity Balanced Fund | 5.79% | 5.69% | 5.67% | 2.28% | 8.06% | 9.66% | 5.90% | 4.24% | 10.99% | 7.90% | 3.07% | 7.70% |
Drawdowns
FSEAX vs. FBALX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSEAX drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, which is greater than FBALX's maximum drawdown of -43.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSEAX and FBALX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSEAX | FBALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.59% | -43.57% | -22.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.42% | -8.14% | -5.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.64% | -22.89% | -30.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.07% | -26.68% | -31.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.03% | -4.56% | -6.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.80% | -4.39% | -20.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.78% | 1.76% | +2.02% |
Volatility
FSEAX vs. FBALX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund (FSEAX) has a higher volatility of 9.99% compared to Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX) at 4.19%. This indicates that FSEAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSEAX | FBALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.99% | 4.19% | +5.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.63% | 6.77% | +7.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.35% | 11.94% | +8.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.56% | 12.18% | +10.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.77% | 12.75% | +8.02% |