FSEAX vs. EEMA
FSEAX (Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund) and EEMA (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FSEAX returned 15.18%/yr vs 9.49%/yr for EEMA. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSEAX charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EEMA.
Performance
FSEAX vs. EEMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSEAX achieves a 33.92% return, which is significantly higher than EEMA's 18.98% return. Over the past 10 years, FSEAX has outperformed EEMA with an annualized return of 15.18%, while EEMA has yielded a comparatively lower 9.49% annualized return.
FSEAX
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- 6M
- 25.79%
- YTD
- 33.92%
- 1Y
- 56.66%
- 3Y*
- 32.61%
- 5Y*
- 7.81%
- 10Y*
- 15.18%
EEMA
- 1D
- -3.06%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- 6M
- 12.59%
- YTD
- 18.98%
- 1Y
- 36.78%
- 3Y*
- 19.74%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- 9.49%
FSEAX vs. EEMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSEAX Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund | 33.92% | 36.43% | 21.80% | 13.58% | -31.26% | -14.91% | 73.43% | 30.97% | -15.08% | 45.13% |
EEMA iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF | 18.98% | 33.27% | 10.23% | 6.57% | -21.49% | -4.22% | 25.17% | 18.60% | -15.76% | 43.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSEAX and EEMA is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2012 | 0.86 |
The correlation between FSEAX and EEMA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSEAX vs. EEMA — Risk / Return Rank
FSEAX
EEMA
FSEAX vs. EEMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund (FSEAX) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSEAX | EEMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.30 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.25 | 2.58 | +1.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.10 | 8.89 | +5.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSEAX vs. EEMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSEAX drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, which is greater than EEMA's maximum drawdown of -44.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSEAX and EEMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSEAX | EEMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.59% | -44.18% | -21.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.42% | -14.30% | +0.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.54% | -20.23% | +2.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.83% | -38.81% | -13.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.07% | -44.18% | -13.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.19% | -8.21% | +3.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.62% | -13.90% | -10.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.03% | 4.15% | -0.12% |
Volatility
FSEAX vs. EEMA - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund (FSEAX) has a higher volatility of 11.28% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA) at 10.02%. This indicates that FSEAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EEMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSEAX | EEMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.28% | 10.02% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.24% | 20.70% | +0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.62% | 23.20% | +0.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.57% | 20.98% | +2.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.37% | 21.05% | +0.32% |
FSEAX vs. EEMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSEAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMA's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSEAX vs. EEMA - Dividend Comparison
FSEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than EEMA's 1.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMA iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF | 1.38% | 1.48% | 1.74% | 2.02% | 1.78% | 2.19% | 1.15% | 1.86% | 2.17% | 1.74% | 1.74% | 2.44% |
FSEAX Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund | 0.16% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 14.14% | 14.10% | 6.15% | 3.44% | 0.05% | 1.26% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, FSEAX and EEMA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FSEAX has higher volatility (11.28%) compared to EEMA (10.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSEAX dropped -65.59% vs EEMA's -44.18%.
FSEAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSEAX and EEMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer