FSDPX vs. COPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio (FSDPX) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX).
FSDPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 28, 1986. COPX is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Copper Miners Index. It was launched on Apr 19, 2010.
Performance
FSDPX vs. COPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSDPX vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSDPX Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio | 9.58% | 11.32% | -2.95% | 7.29% | -9.86% | 31.66% | 21.78% | 12.40% | -23.74% | 25.99% |
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 6.35% | 93.50% | 3.57% | 8.38% | -0.76% | 23.39% | 51.66% | 12.48% | -31.31% | 38.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSDPX achieves a 9.58% return, which is significantly higher than COPX's 6.35% return. Over the past 10 years, FSDPX has underperformed COPX with an annualized return of 8.22%, while COPX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.82% annualized return.
FSDPX
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -7.63%
- YTD
- 9.58%
- 6M
- 9.12%
- 1Y
- 20.48%
- 3Y*
- 7.08%
- 5Y*
- 6.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.22%
COPX
- 1D
- 7.92%
- 1M
- -20.22%
- YTD
- 6.35%
- 6M
- 30.65%
- 1Y
- 101.10%
- 3Y*
- 28.34%
- 5Y*
- 18.72%
- 10Y*
- 20.82%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSDPX vs. COPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSDPX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than COPX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSDPX vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank
FSDPX
COPX
FSDPX vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio (FSDPX) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSDPX | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.04 | 2.41 | -1.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 2.75 | -1.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.38 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 3.46 | -2.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.68 | 13.40 | -8.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSDPX | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 2.41 | -1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.52 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.59 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.16 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSDPX and COPX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSDPX vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison
FSDPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than COPX's 2.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSDPX Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio | 1.77% | 1.94% | 12.46% | 5.46% | 3.34% | 0.71% | 0.68% | 1.22% | 12.89% | 5.08% | 1.05% | 2.42% |
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 2.52% | 2.68% | 1.80% | 2.39% | 3.14% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 2.59% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 1.20% |
Drawdowns
FSDPX vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSDPX drawdown since its inception was -64.19%, smaller than the maximum COPX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSDPX and COPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSDPX | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.19% | -83.16% | +18.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.53% | -27.82% | +14.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.39% | -42.12% | +16.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.89% | -65.41% | +15.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.63% | -20.22% | +12.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.33% | -39.60% | +28.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.00% | 7.20% | -3.20% |
Volatility
FSDPX vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio (FSDPX) is 6.64%, while Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a volatility of 18.96%. This indicates that FSDPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSDPX | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.64% | 18.96% | -12.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.61% | 33.75% | -20.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.54% | 42.22% | -21.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.29% | 36.05% | -15.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.64% | 35.51% | -13.87% |