PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSDHX vs. RPHIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSDHX vs. RPHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class C (FSDHX) and RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund (RPHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSDHX achieves a 2.63% return, which is significantly higher than RPHIX's 1.76% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSDHX having a 3.59% annualized return and RPHIX not far behind at 3.54%.


FSDHX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.74%
YTD
2.63%
6M
3.07%
1Y
7.80%
3Y*
7.44%
5Y*
3.42%
10Y*
3.59%

RPHIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.42%
YTD
1.76%
6M
2.31%
1Y
4.39%
3Y*
5.65%
5Y*
4.63%
10Y*
3.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSDHX vs. RPHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSDHX
Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class C
2.63%6.64%6.72%9.17%-8.04%1.91%2.93%8.23%-2.22%3.92%
RPHIX
RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund
1.76%4.76%6.71%5.87%2.97%2.05%1.95%2.77%2.44%2.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FSDHX and RPHIX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2013

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSDHX vs. RPHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSDHX
FSDHX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FSDHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSDHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSDHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FSDHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSDHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

RPHIX
RPHIX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
RPHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
RPHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSDHX vs. RPHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class C (FSDHX) and RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund (RPHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSDHXRPHIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

3.74

-2.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.83

43.68

-38.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.58

122.56

-97.98

FSDHX vs. RPHIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSDHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is lower than the RPHIX Sharpe Ratio of 5.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSDHX and RPHIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSDHXRPHIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93

5.17

-2.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

3.68

-2.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

2.96

-2.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

2.96

-2.27

Drawdowns

FSDHX vs. RPHIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSDHX drawdown since its inception was -16.84%, which is greater than RPHIX's maximum drawdown of -3.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSDHX and RPHIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSDHXRPHIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.84%

-3.16%

-13.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.67%

-0.10%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.38%

-0.72%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.95%

-0.92%

-9.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.84%

-3.16%

-13.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.81%

-0.09%

-1.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.33%

0.04%

+0.29%

Volatility

FSDHX vs. RPHIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class C (FSDHX) has a higher volatility of 0.77% compared to RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund (RPHIX) at 0.24%. This indicates that FSDHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSDHXRPHIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.77%

0.24%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.12%

0.59%

+1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75%

0.88%

+1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.74%

1.26%

+2.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.17%

1.20%

+2.97%

FSDHX vs. RPHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSDHX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than RPHIX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSDHX vs. RPHIX - Dividend Comparison

FSDHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, more than RPHIX's 4.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSDHX
Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class C
6.26%6.33%5.14%4.98%2.17%2.00%2.49%3.23%3.49%3.12%3.68%3.42%
RPHIX
RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund
4.08%4.76%6.40%5.08%3.46%2.03%2.44%2.85%2.83%2.68%2.63%3.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSDHX and RPHIX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSDHX has higher volatility (0.77%) compared to RPHIX (0.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSDHX dropped -16.84% vs RPHIX's -3.16%.

RPHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.17 vs 2.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSDHX and RPHIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer