PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSDHX vs. MDHVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSDHX vs. MDHVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class C (FSDHX) and MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund (MDHVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FSDHX having a 1.90% return and MDHVX slightly lower at 1.89%. Over the past 10 years, FSDHX has underperformed MDHVX with an annualized return of 3.33%, while MDHVX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.39% annualized return.


FSDHX

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.67%
6M
1.28%
YTD
1.90%
1Y
5.56%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
3.19%
10Y*
3.33%
ALL TIME*
2.70%

MDHVX

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.21%
6M
1.56%
YTD
1.89%
1Y
3.89%
3Y*
6.03%
5Y*
4.24%
10Y*
4.39%
ALL TIME*
4.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FSDHX vs. MDHVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSDHX
Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class C
1.90%6.64%6.72%9.17%-8.04%1.91%2.93%8.23%-2.22%3.92%
MDHVX
MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund
1.89%5.38%6.51%9.86%-2.81%4.38%2.92%9.00%-0.13%4.30%

Correlation

The correlation between FSDHX and MDHVX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2013

0.72

The correlation between FSDHX and MDHVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSDHX vs. MDHVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSDHX
FSDHX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FSDHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSDHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSDHX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FSDHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSDHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

MDHVX
MDHVX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
MDHVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDHVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDHVX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
MDHVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDHVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSDHX vs. MDHVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class C (FSDHX) and MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund (MDHVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSDHXMDHVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.51

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

3.53

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.03

16.88

-0.85

FSDHX vs. MDHVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSDHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the MDHVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSDHX and MDHVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSDHX vs. MDHVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSDHX drawdown since its inception was -16.84%, smaller than the maximum MDHVX drawdown of -18.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSDHX and MDHVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSDHXMDHVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.84%

-18.04%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.67%

-1.06%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.38%

-2.65%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.95%

-6.26%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.84%

-18.04%

+1.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-0.32%

-0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.79%

-0.77%

-1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

0.22%

+0.14%

Volatility

FSDHX vs. MDHVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class C (FSDHX) has a higher volatility of 0.52% compared to MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund (MDHVX) at 0.46%. This indicates that FSDHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDHVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSDHXMDHVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.52%

0.46%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.22%

1.33%

+0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80%

1.80%

+1.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.75%

2.59%

+1.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.14%

3.41%

+0.73%

FSDHX vs. MDHVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSDHX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MDHVX's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSDHX vs. MDHVX - Dividend Comparison

FSDHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%, more than MDHVX's 4.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSDHX
Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class C
5.91%6.33%5.14%4.98%2.17%2.00%2.49%3.23%3.49%3.12%3.68%3.42%
MDHVX
MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund
4.80%5.47%6.01%5.53%4.31%3.80%4.44%4.37%4.33%4.03%4.95%4.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSDHX and MDHVX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSDHX has higher volatility (0.52%) compared to MDHVX (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSDHX dropped -16.84% vs MDHVX's -18.04%.

FSDHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSDHX and MDHVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer