FSDAX vs. FCLTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Defense & Aerospace Portfolio (FSDAX) and Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class M (FCLTX).
FSDAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 8, 1984. FCLTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996.
Performance
FSDAX vs. FCLTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSDAX vs. FCLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSDAX Fidelity Select Defense & Aerospace Portfolio | -3.56% | 50.03% | 15.83% | 16.29% | 6.83% | 4.91% | -7.87% | 33.75% | -6.83% | 34.15% |
FCLTX Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class M | 0.72% | 24.14% | 27.80% | 22.34% | -10.87% | 15.97% | 10.89% | 27.44% | -16.03% | 19.25% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSDAX achieves a -3.56% return, which is significantly lower than FCLTX's 0.72% return. Over the past 10 years, FSDAX has outperformed FCLTX with an annualized return of 14.95%, while FCLTX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.22% annualized return.
FSDAX
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- -14.26%
- YTD
- -3.56%
- 6M
- -1.06%
- 1Y
- 34.57%
- 3Y*
- 23.65%
- 5Y*
- 15.00%
- 10Y*
- 14.95%
FCLTX
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- -12.58%
- YTD
- 0.72%
- 6M
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 28.88%
- 3Y*
- 24.06%
- 5Y*
- 14.13%
- 10Y*
- 12.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSDAX vs. FCLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSDAX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than FCLTX's 1.27% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSDAX vs. FCLTX — Risk / Return Rank
FSDAX
FCLTX
FSDAX vs. FCLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Defense & Aerospace Portfolio (FSDAX) and Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class M (FCLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSDAX | FCLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.48 | 1.31 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.02 | 1.87 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.26 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | 1.97 | -0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.81 | 7.73 | +0.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSDAX | FCLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 1.31 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.69 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.58 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.48 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSDAX and FCLTX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSDAX vs. FCLTX - Dividend Comparison
FSDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, more than FCLTX's 1.80% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSDAX Fidelity Select Defense & Aerospace Portfolio | 4.65% | 4.48% | 7.68% | 6.47% | 8.87% | 8.38% | 2.11% | 2.62% | 11.45% | 3.57% | 4.87% | 6.30% |
FCLTX Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class M | 1.80% | 1.82% | 7.91% | 8.95% | 3.54% | 22.27% | 0.60% | 7.40% | 12.19% | 2.81% | 5.59% | 9.09% |
Drawdowns
FSDAX vs. FCLTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSDAX drawdown since its inception was -60.59%, roughly equal to the maximum FCLTX drawdown of -61.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSDAX and FCLTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSDAX | FCLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.59% | -61.07% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.13% | -13.31% | -2.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.84% | -26.59% | +3.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.08% | -42.73% | -4.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.13% | -13.12% | -3.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.45% | -8.39% | -2.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 3.39% | +0.65% |
Volatility
FSDAX vs. FCLTX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Select Defense & Aerospace Portfolio (FSDAX) has a higher volatility of 7.71% compared to Fidelity Advisor Industrials Fund Class M (FCLTX) at 6.69%. This indicates that FSDAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSDAX | FCLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.71% | 6.69% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.52% | 13.33% | +2.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.22% | 22.50% | +0.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.92% | 20.59% | -0.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.07% | 21.32% | +0.75% |