FSCS vs. RDVY

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FSCS (First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF) and RDVY (First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSCS is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the SMID Capital Strength Index, while RDVY is a Dividend fund tracking the Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FSCS returned 6.49%/yr vs 12.89%/yr for RDVY. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FSCS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for RDVY.

Performance

FSCS vs. RDVY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF (FSCS) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSCS achieves a 5.33% return, which is significantly lower than RDVY's 17.25% return.

FSCS

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.73%
• 6M: 2.50%
• YTD: 5.33%
• 1Y: 6.10%
• 3Y*: 9.17%
• 5Y*: 6.49%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.87%

RDVY

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 1.19%
• 6M: 12.71%
• YTD: 17.25%
• 1Y: 30.74%
• 3Y*: 19.76%
• 5Y*: 12.89%
• 10Y*: 16.25%
• ALL TIME*: 13.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FSCS First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF	$142.63K	$149.23K	$210.39K
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF	$77.65M	$79.19M	$83.63M

FSCS vs. RDVY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSCS First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF	5.33%	1.77%	14.98%	16.81%	-9.11%	26.08%	5.71%	28.00%	-12.85%	11.41%
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF	17.25%	18.90%	16.41%	20.38%	-13.27%	31.14%	13.47%	37.71%	-9.92%	11.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FSCS and RDVY is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2017	0.83

The correlation between FSCS and RDVY shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FSCS vs. RDVY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FSCS	RDVY
Financial Services	28.7%	38.9%
Industrials	26.7%	12.5%
Consumer Defensive	13.9%	2.8%
Consumer Cyclical	8.9%	11.1%
Basic Materials	5.9%	-
Healthcare	5.9%	5.6%
Technology	4.0%	19.4%
Communication Services	2.0%	4.2%
Energy	2.0%	2.8%
Real Estate	1.0%	-
Utilities	1.0%	1.4%

Return for Risk

FSCS vs. RDVY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSCS

FSCS Risk / Return Rank: 21
FSCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
FSCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
FSCS Omega Ratio Rank: 19
FSCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
FSCS Martin Ratio Rank: 21

RDVY

RDVY Risk / Return Rank: 85
RDVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
RDVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
RDVY Omega Ratio Rank: 82
RDVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
RDVY Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSCS vs. RDVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF (FSCS) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSCS	RDVY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.41	2.00	-1.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.71	2.87	-2.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.35	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.66	3.25	-2.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.37	13.63	-12.26

FSCS vs. RDVY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSCS Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the RDVY Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSCS and RDVY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSCS vs. RDVY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSCS drawdown since its inception was -43.57%, which is greater than RDVY's maximum drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCS and RDVY.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSCS	RDVY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.57%	-40.60%	-2.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.81%	-9.04%	+1.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.55%	-19.11%	-0.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.25%	-25.32%	+4.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.12%	0.00%	-2.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.93%	-4.95%	-0.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.74%	2.15%	+1.59%

Volatility

FSCS vs. RDVY - Volatility Comparison

First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF (FSCS) has a higher volatility of 4.22% compared to First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) at 3.53%. This indicates that FSCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDVY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSCS	RDVY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.22%	3.53%	+0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.76%	11.46%	-2.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.55%	14.65%	-2.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.98%	18.92%	-0.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.08%	21.03%	+0.05%

FSCS vs. RDVY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSCS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than RDVY's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSCS vs. RDVY - Dividend Comparison

FSCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than RDVY's 0.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSCS First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF	0.98%	0.75%	1.12%	1.47%	1.71%	1.21%	1.33%	1.68%	1.67%	0.67%	0.00%	0.00%
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF	0.83%	1.11%	1.64%	2.09%	2.21%	1.04%	1.53%	1.55%	1.68%	1.25%	2.07%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSCS and RDVY in my portfolio?

FSCS and RDVY have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSCS or RDVY?

FSCS has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to RDVY (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSCS dropped -43.57% vs RDVY's -40.60%.

Which ETF is better, FSCS or RDVY?

On 5-year performance, RDVY leads with 12.89% vs 6.49% for FSCS. On fees, RDVY is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, RDVY has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FSCS or RDVY?

Over the 5-year period, RDVY has performed better with a 12.89% return vs 6.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FSCS or RDVY?

RDVY is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FSCS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FSCS or RDVY?

FSCS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.83% for RDVY.

What is the main difference between FSCS and RDVY?

FSCS is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while RDVY is Dividend. FSCS tracks SMID Capital Strength Index, while RDVY tracks Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FSCS and 0.47% for RDVY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RDVY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.