PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSCRX vs. FSHCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSCRX vs. FSHCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small Cap Discovery Fund (FSCRX) and Fidelity Select Health Care Services Portfolio (FSHCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSCRX achieves a 15.93% return, which is significantly lower than FSHCX's 16.94% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSCRX having a 9.73% annualized return and FSHCX not far behind at 9.63%.


FSCRX

1D
2.33%
1M
-1.09%
6M
11.70%
YTD
15.93%
1Y
27.16%
3Y*
11.32%
5Y*
7.32%
10Y*
9.73%
ALL TIME*
10.42%

FSHCX

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.29%
6M
22.13%
YTD
16.94%
1Y
42.00%
3Y*
2.68%
5Y*
2.72%
10Y*
9.63%
ALL TIME*
11.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FSCRX vs. FSHCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSCRX
Fidelity Small Cap Discovery Fund
15.93%10.89%2.75%21.28%-16.68%35.66%6.87%27.31%-14.06%7.71%
FSHCX
Fidelity Select Health Care Services Portfolio
16.94%3.85%-13.21%1.52%0.86%20.22%18.58%19.91%10.17%24.46%

Correlation

The correlation between FSCRX and FSHCX is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2000

0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between FSCRX and FSHCX has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSCRX vs. FSHCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSCRX
FSCRX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
FSCRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSCRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSCRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FSCRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSCRX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FSHCX
FSHCX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FSHCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSHCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSHCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FSHCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSHCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSCRX vs. FSHCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small Cap Discovery Fund (FSCRX) and Fidelity Select Health Care Services Portfolio (FSHCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSCRXFSHCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.33

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

2.09

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.63

6.95

-0.32

FSCRX vs. FSHCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSCRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the FSHCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSCRX and FSHCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSCRX vs. FSHCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSCRX drawdown since its inception was -56.27%, roughly equal to the maximum FSHCX drawdown of -57.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCRX and FSHCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSCRXFSHCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.27%

-57.81%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.34%

-16.65%

+5.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.51%

-29.52%

+7.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.91%

-29.52%

+3.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.06%

-35.48%

-11.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.08%

-2.75%

-1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.89%

-11.34%

+3.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

5.04%

-1.47%

Volatility

FSCRX vs. FSHCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Small Cap Discovery Fund (FSCRX) is 5.32%, while Fidelity Select Health Care Services Portfolio (FSHCX) has a volatility of 6.23%. This indicates that FSCRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSHCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSCRXFSHCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

6.23%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.66%

13.56%

+1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.99%

19.96%

-0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.34%

19.38%

+0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.72%

21.54%

+0.18%

FSCRX vs. FSHCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSCRX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than FSHCX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSCRX vs. FSHCX - Dividend Comparison

FSCRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.06%, more than FSHCX's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSCRX
Fidelity Small Cap Discovery Fund
13.06%14.70%13.03%4.44%11.56%6.12%2.79%7.46%35.48%13.68%0.44%7.28%
FSHCX
Fidelity Select Health Care Services Portfolio
0.65%0.75%16.63%0.57%5.32%7.09%0.76%0.27%12.92%13.41%4.62%4.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSCRX and FSHCX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSHCX has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to FSCRX (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSCRX dropped -56.27% vs FSHCX's -57.81%.

FSHCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSCRX and FSHCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer