FSCPX vs. SNOW
FSCPX (Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio) is Consumer Discretionary Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while SNOW (Snowflake Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, FSCPX returned 6.72%/yr vs -0.11%/yr for SNOW. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
FSCPX vs. SNOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSCPX achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than SNOW's 9.99% return.
FSCPX
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 13.87%
- 3Y*
- 16.92%
- 5Y*
- 6.72%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
SNOW
- 1D
- -7.61%
- 1M
- 67.31%
- YTD
- 9.99%
- 6M
- -8.95%
- 1Y
- 15.36%
- 3Y*
- 11.26%
- 5Y*
- -0.11%
- 10Y*
- —
FSCPX vs. SNOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSCPX Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio | 0.24% | 7.88% | 24.56% | 41.81% | -34.88% | 19.23% | 13.73% |
SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 9.99% | 42.06% | -22.41% | 38.64% | -57.63% | 20.38% | 10.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSCPX and SNOW is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2020 | 0.52 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FSCPX and SNOW has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSCPX vs. SNOW — Risk / Return Rank
FSCPX
SNOW
FSCPX vs. SNOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX) and Snowflake Inc. (SNOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSCPX | SNOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.12 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 0.27 | +0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.92 | 0.60 | +2.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSCPX | SNOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | 0.24 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | -0.00 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | -0.01 | +0.56 |
Drawdowns
FSCPX vs. SNOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSCPX drawdown since its inception was -57.76%, smaller than the maximum SNOW drawdown of -72.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCPX and SNOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSCPX | SNOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.76% | -72.99% | +15.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.99% | -56.30% | +40.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.71% | -56.30% | +28.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.23% | -72.99% | +33.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.05% | -39.96% | +34.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.55% | -49.10% | +40.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.02% | 25.82% | -20.80% |
Volatility
FSCPX vs. SNOW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX) is 5.99%, while Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) has a volatility of 36.32%. This indicates that FSCPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSCPX | SNOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.99% | 36.32% | -30.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.67% | 54.14% | -40.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.93% | 65.21% | -46.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.78% | 61.92% | -37.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.72% | 62.81% | -40.09% |
Dividends
FSCPX vs. SNOW - Dividend Comparison
FSCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.17%, while SNOW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSCPX Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio | 9.17% | 5.78% | 7.41% | 2.17% | 13.79% | 9.08% | 1.16% | 2.22% | 3.32% | 3.72% | 0.90% | 3.81% |
SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSCPX and SNOW have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SNOW has higher volatility (36.32%) compared to FSCPX (5.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSCPX dropped -57.76% vs SNOW's -72.99%.
FSCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSCPX and SNOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer