PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSCPX vs. FSELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSCPX vs. FSELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSCPX achieves a -0.26% return, which is significantly lower than FSELX's 86.42% return. Over the past 10 years, FSCPX has underperformed FSELX with an annualized return of 12.29%, while FSELX has yielded a comparatively higher 39.28% annualized return.


FSCPX

1D
-0.50%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
-0.26%
6M
0.05%
1Y
13.75%
3Y*
16.73%
5Y*
6.47%
10Y*
12.29%

FSELX

1D
0.46%
1M
23.91%
YTD
86.42%
6M
84.56%
1Y
162.37%
3Y*
69.11%
5Y*
46.37%
10Y*
39.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSCPX vs. FSELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSCPX
Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio
-0.26%7.88%24.56%41.81%-34.88%19.23%35.68%27.06%-1.03%21.70%
FSELX
Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio
86.42%52.17%49.68%78.49%-35.27%59.16%44.33%64.50%-12.01%34.51%

Correlation

The correlation between FSCPX and FSELX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 1990

0.64

The correlation between FSCPX and FSELX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSCPX vs. FSELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSCPX
FSCPX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
FSCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FSCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

FSELX
FSELX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FSELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSELX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FSELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSELX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSCPX vs. FSELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSCPXFSELXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.69

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

11.73

-10.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.65

45.05

-42.40

FSCPX vs. FSELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSCPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the FSELX Sharpe Ratio of 5.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSCPX and FSELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSCPXFSELXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

5.17

-4.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

1.20

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

1.12

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.55

-0.01

Drawdowns

FSCPX vs. FSELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSCPX drawdown since its inception was -57.76%, smaller than the maximum FSELX drawdown of -82.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCPX and FSELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSCPXFSELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.76%

-82.54%

+24.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.99%

-14.38%

-1.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.71%

-36.31%

+8.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.23%

-46.37%

+7.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.23%

-46.37%

+7.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.53%

0.00%

-5.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.55%

-28.70%

+20.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.03%

3.74%

+1.29%

Volatility

FSCPX vs. FSELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX) is 5.91%, while Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX) has a volatility of 11.98%. This indicates that FSCPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSCPXFSELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.91%

11.98%

-6.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.68%

25.42%

-11.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.94%

32.72%

-13.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.78%

38.96%

-14.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.72%

35.06%

-12.34%

FSCPX vs. FSELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSCPX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FSELX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSCPX vs. FSELX - Dividend Comparison

FSCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.21%, more than FSELX's 8.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSCPX
Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio
9.21%5.78%7.41%2.17%13.79%9.08%1.16%2.22%3.32%3.72%0.90%3.81%
FSELX
Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio
8.79%11.11%7.97%7.20%6.69%6.99%8.13%3.36%26.80%14.44%3.82%15.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSCPX and FSELX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSELX has higher volatility (11.98%) compared to FSCPX (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSCPX dropped -57.76% vs FSELX's -82.54%.

FSELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.17 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSCPX and FSELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer