PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSCPX vs. CRWD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSCPX vs. CRWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSCPX achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than CRWD's 59.49% return.


FSCPX

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.83%
YTD
0.24%
6M
0.10%
1Y
13.87%
3Y*
16.92%
5Y*
6.72%
10Y*
12.34%

CRWD

1D
-2.78%
1M
59.32%
YTD
59.49%
6M
42.63%
1Y
52.96%
3Y*
70.32%
5Y*
29.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSCPX vs. CRWD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FSCPX
Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio
0.24%7.88%24.56%41.81%-34.88%19.23%35.68%7.53%
CRWD
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
59.49%37.00%34.01%142.49%-48.58%-3.34%324.74%-14.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FSCPX and CRWD is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019

0.45

Over the past year, the correlation between FSCPX and CRWD has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSCPX vs. CRWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSCPX
FSCPX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
FSCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FSCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

CRWD
CRWD Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CRWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRWD Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
CRWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRWD Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSCPX vs. CRWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSCPXCRWDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.23

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

1.43

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.92

3.29

-0.38

FSCPX vs. CRWD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSCPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the CRWD Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSCPX and CRWD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSCPXCRWDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

1.19

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.58

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.79

-0.25

Drawdowns

FSCPX vs. CRWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSCPX drawdown since its inception was -57.76%, smaller than the maximum CRWD drawdown of -67.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCPX and CRWD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSCPXCRWDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.76%

-67.69%

+9.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.99%

-37.18%

+21.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.71%

-44.44%

+16.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.23%

-67.69%

+28.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.05%

-4.42%

-0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.55%

-23.66%

+15.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.02%

16.14%

-11.12%

Volatility

FSCPX vs. CRWD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX) is 5.99%, while CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) has a volatility of 15.34%. This indicates that FSCPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSCPXCRWDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.99%

15.34%

-9.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.67%

36.18%

-22.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.93%

44.66%

-25.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.78%

50.73%

-25.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.72%

55.95%

-33.23%

Dividends

FSCPX vs. CRWD - Dividend Comparison

FSCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.17%, while CRWD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRWD
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSCPX
Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio
9.17%5.78%7.41%2.17%13.79%9.08%1.16%2.22%3.32%3.72%0.90%3.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSCPX and CRWD have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRWD has higher volatility (15.34%) compared to FSCPX (5.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSCPX dropped -57.76% vs CRWD's -67.69%.

CRWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSCPX and CRWD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer