PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSCNX vs. LIVIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSCNX vs. LIVIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class C (FSCNX) and BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Fund (LIVIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSCNX achieves a 9.92% return, which is significantly lower than LIVIX's 13.10% return. Over the past 10 years, FSCNX has underperformed LIVIX with an annualized return of 7.90%, while LIVIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.04% annualized return.


FSCNX

1D
0.44%
1M
3.78%
YTD
9.92%
6M
10.58%
1Y
22.21%
3Y*
13.50%
5Y*
6.20%
10Y*
7.90%

LIVIX

1D
0.47%
1M
5.62%
YTD
13.10%
6M
13.99%
1Y
29.98%
3Y*
19.96%
5Y*
10.51%
10Y*
12.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSCNX vs. LIVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSCNX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class C
9.92%15.36%8.35%13.51%-17.12%10.69%14.85%19.32%-7.54%14.93%
LIVIX
BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Fund
13.10%21.57%13.60%21.62%-18.38%18.75%14.99%26.76%-7.83%21.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FSCNX and LIVIX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2011

0.97

The correlation between FSCNX and LIVIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSCNX vs. LIVIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSCNX
FSCNX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FSCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FSCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

LIVIX
LIVIX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
LIVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
LIVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSCNX vs. LIVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class C (FSCNX) and BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Fund (LIVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSCNXLIVIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.46

2.43

+0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.48

3.37

+0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.44

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

3.22

-0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.71

14.29

-0.58

FSCNX vs. LIVIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSCNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the LIVIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSCNX and LIVIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSCNXLIVIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

2.43

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.67

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.72

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.64

-0.18

Drawdowns

FSCNX vs. LIVIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSCNX drawdown since its inception was -42.29%, which is greater than LIVIX's maximum drawdown of -34.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCNX and LIVIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSCNXLIVIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.29%

-34.44%

-7.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.19%

-9.44%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.20%

-17.39%

+6.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.16%

-26.45%

+3.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.47%

-34.44%

+9.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.00%

-4.52%

-1.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

2.13%

-0.49%

Volatility

FSCNX vs. LIVIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class C (FSCNX) is 3.01%, while BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Fund (LIVIX) has a volatility of 3.86%. This indicates that FSCNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIVIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSCNXLIVIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

3.86%

-0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.47%

10.06%

-2.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.13%

12.54%

-3.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.80%

15.84%

-5.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.96%

16.72%

-5.76%

FSCNX vs. LIVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSCNX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than LIVIX's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSCNX vs. LIVIX - Dividend Comparison

FSCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than LIVIX's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSCNX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class C
4.40%4.83%2.17%0.85%3.16%1.48%0.87%3.07%3.50%1.81%0.20%3.10%
LIVIX
BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Fund
2.19%2.48%0.01%2.04%1.96%2.04%1.56%2.95%2.35%2.27%1.54%2.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, FSCNX and LIVIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LIVIX has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to FSCNX (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSCNX dropped -42.29% vs LIVIX's -34.44%.

FSCNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSCNX and LIVIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer