FSCDX vs. WEMMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A (FSCDX) and TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund (WEMMX).
FSCDX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 9, 1998. WEMMX is managed by Teton Westwood. It was launched on May 11, 1998.
Performance
FSCDX vs. WEMMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSCDX vs. WEMMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSCDX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A | 0.63% | 11.85% | -2.52% | 18.29% | -20.70% | 31.22% | 17.13% | 32.31% | -16.38% | 13.77% |
WEMMX TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund | 4.76% | 11.02% | 3.83% | 13.53% | -15.37% | 21.44% | 10.02% | 16.94% | -13.69% | 15.47% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSCDX achieves a 0.63% return, which is significantly lower than WEMMX's 4.76% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSCDX having a 8.24% annualized return and WEMMX not far behind at 8.17%.
FSCDX
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- -7.93%
- YTD
- 0.63%
- 6M
- 4.06%
- 1Y
- 22.66%
- 3Y*
- 7.26%
- 5Y*
- 3.36%
- 10Y*
- 8.24%
WEMMX
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -7.13%
- YTD
- 4.76%
- 6M
- 4.86%
- 1Y
- 24.54%
- 3Y*
- 9.77%
- 5Y*
- 4.35%
- 10Y*
- 8.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSCDX vs. WEMMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSCDX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is lower than WEMMX's 1.41% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSCDX vs. WEMMX — Risk / Return Rank
FSCDX
WEMMX
FSCDX vs. WEMMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A (FSCDX) and TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund (WEMMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSCDX | WEMMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 1.21 | -0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | 1.80 | -0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.22 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 1.90 | -0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.28 | 6.03 | +0.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSCDX | WEMMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 1.21 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.23 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.40 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.61 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSCDX and WEMMX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSCDX vs. WEMMX - Dividend Comparison
FSCDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, less than WEMMX's 21.77% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSCDX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A | 1.90% | 1.92% | 0.00% | 1.36% | 5.36% | 10.98% | 2.70% | 3.97% | 14.60% | 14.03% | 2.35% | 8.39% |
WEMMX TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund | 21.77% | 22.80% | 26.79% | 18.86% | 13.60% | 15.44% | 9.23% | 4.11% | 4.16% | 6.44% | 4.61% | 2.35% |
Drawdowns
FSCDX vs. WEMMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSCDX drawdown since its inception was -50.10%, which is greater than WEMMX's maximum drawdown of -42.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCDX and WEMMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSCDX | WEMMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.10% | -42.48% | -7.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.77% | -11.39% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.42% | -27.11% | -8.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.44% | -41.73% | +1.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.27% | -8.04% | -2.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.69% | -6.65% | -5.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 3.60% | -0.39% |
Volatility
FSCDX vs. WEMMX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A (FSCDX) has a higher volatility of 6.42% compared to TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund (WEMMX) at 5.84%. This indicates that FSCDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WEMMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSCDX | WEMMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.42% | 5.84% | +0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.61% | 12.24% | +0.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.92% | 20.00% | +1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.07% | 18.87% | +3.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 20.36% | +1.54% |