PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSCDX vs. VSTCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSCDX vs. VSTCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A (FSCDX) and Vanguard Strategic Small-Cap Equity Fund (VSTCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FSCDX having a 18.39% return and VSTCX slightly lower at 18.22%. Over the past 10 years, FSCDX has underperformed VSTCX with an annualized return of 9.72%, while VSTCX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.71% annualized return.


FSCDX

1D
0.99%
1M
2.97%
YTD
18.39%
6M
16.57%
1Y
37.58%
3Y*
13.63%
5Y*
6.03%
10Y*
9.72%

VSTCX

1D
0.58%
1M
3.68%
YTD
18.22%
6M
18.42%
1Y
41.82%
3Y*
22.14%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*
12.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSCDX vs. VSTCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSCDX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A
18.39%11.85%-2.52%18.29%-20.70%31.22%17.13%32.31%-16.38%13.77%
VSTCX
Vanguard Strategic Small-Cap Equity Fund
18.22%15.20%15.40%21.34%-13.00%33.53%8.38%22.18%-11.87%9.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FSCDX and VSTCX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2006

0.95

The correlation between FSCDX and VSTCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSCDX vs. VSTCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSCDX
FSCDX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FSCDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSCDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSCDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FSCDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSCDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

VSTCX
VSTCX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
VSTCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSTCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSTCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VSTCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSTCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSCDX vs. VSTCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A (FSCDX) and Vanguard Strategic Small-Cap Equity Fund (VSTCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSCDXVSTCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.43

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.30

5.44

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.18

19.17

-2.99

FSCDX vs. VSTCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSCDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the VSTCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSCDX and VSTCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSCDXVSTCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

2.50

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.54

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.54

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.38

+0.08

Drawdowns

FSCDX vs. VSTCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSCDX drawdown since its inception was -50.10%, smaller than the maximum VSTCX drawdown of -62.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCDX and VSTCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSCDXVSTCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.10%

-62.50%

+12.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.33%

-8.08%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.42%

-27.47%

-7.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.42%

-27.47%

-7.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.44%

-48.08%

+7.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

0.00%

-0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.63%

-10.65%

-0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

2.29%

+0.19%

Volatility

FSCDX vs. VSTCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A (FSCDX) has a higher volatility of 5.55% compared to Vanguard Strategic Small-Cap Equity Fund (VSTCX) at 4.49%. This indicates that FSCDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSTCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSCDXVSTCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.55%

4.49%

+1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.02%

11.97%

+1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.66%

17.57%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.15%

21.99%

+0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.99%

23.47%

-1.48%

FSCDX vs. VSTCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSCDX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than VSTCX's 0.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSCDX vs. VSTCX - Dividend Comparison

FSCDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than VSTCX's 6.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSCDX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class A
1.62%1.92%0.00%1.36%5.36%10.98%2.70%3.97%14.60%14.03%2.35%8.39%
VSTCX
Vanguard Strategic Small-Cap Equity Fund
6.38%7.55%9.66%2.50%7.44%19.92%1.24%4.14%11.74%5.76%1.35%2.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FSCDX and VSTCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSCDX has higher volatility (5.55%) compared to VSTCX (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSCDX dropped -50.10% vs VSTCX's -62.50%.

VSTCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSCDX and VSTCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer