FSCC vs. TNA

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FSCC (Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF) and TNA (Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - FSCC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Federated Hermes, while TNA is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index (300% Daily). FSCC is actively managed, while TNA is passively managed. Over the past year, FSCC returned 44.27% vs 140.92% for TNA. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FSCC charges 0.36%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TNA.

Performance

FSCC vs. TNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSCC achieves a 20.60% return, which is significantly lower than TNA's 61.93% return.

FSCC

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 4.77%
• YTD: 20.60%
• 6M: 17.48%
• 1Y: 44.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TNA

• 1D: 2.70%
• 1M: 13.10%
• YTD: 61.93%
• 6M: 47.75%
• 1Y: 140.92%
• 3Y*: 33.72%
• 5Y*: -4.64%
• 10Y*: 10.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSCC vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FSCC Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF	20.60%	15.30%	2.15%
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares	61.93%	9.82%	-10.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FSCC and TNA is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2024	0.97

The correlation between FSCC and TNA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

FSCC vs. TNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FSCC	TNA
Industrials	20.7%	18.0%
Technology	17.6%	19.1%
Healthcare	17.5%	16.3%
Financial Services	17.1%	15.3%
Consumer Cyclical	7.1%	8.0%
Real Estate	6.2%	5.9%
Energy	4.3%	5.4%
Basic Materials	3.5%	4.7%
Consumer Defensive	2.5%	2.3%
Communication Services	1.9%	2.4%
Utilities	1.7%	2.7%

Return for Risk

FSCC vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSCC

FSCC Risk / Return Rank: 74
FSCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FSCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FSCC Omega Ratio Rank: 66
FSCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FSCC Martin Ratio Rank: 78

TNA

TNA Risk / Return Rank: 71
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 55
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSCC vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSCC	TNA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.27	2.42	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.11	2.77	+0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.33	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.02	4.36	-0.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.68	14.30	+0.38

FSCC vs. TNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSCC Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the TNA Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSCC and TNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSCC vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSCC drawdown since its inception was -27.17%, smaller than the maximum TNA drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCC and TNA.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSCC	TNA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.17%	-88.09%	+60.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.07%	-32.53%	+21.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-65.78%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-82.36%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-88.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-31.52%	+31.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.08%	-33.92%	+28.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.02%	9.89%	-6.87%

Volatility

FSCC vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) is 6.18%, while Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) has a volatility of 19.53%. This indicates that FSCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSCC	TNA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.18%	19.53%	-13.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.11%	42.57%	-28.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.61%	58.77%	-39.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.36%	67.55%	-45.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.36%	68.59%	-46.23%

FSCC vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSCC has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than TNA's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSCC vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison

FSCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than TNA's 0.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSCC Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF	0.22%	0.27%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares	0.37%	0.78%	0.93%	1.27%	0.31%	0.06%	0.03%	0.44%	0.36%	0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSCC and TNA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, FSCC and TNA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FSCC or TNA?

TNA has higher volatility (19.53%) compared to FSCC (6.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSCC dropped -27.17% vs TNA's -88.09%.

Which ETF is better, FSCC or TNA?

On 1-year performance, TNA leads with 140.92% vs 44.27% for FSCC. On fees, FSCC is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, FSCC has been the lower-risk option at 6.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FSCC or TNA?

Over the 1-year period, TNA has performed better with a 140.92% return vs 44.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FSCC or TNA?

FSCC is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TNA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FSCC or TNA?

TNA has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.22% for FSCC.

What is the main difference between FSCC and TNA?

FSCC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while TNA is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Federated Hermes and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for FSCC and 1.05% for TNA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.