FSCC vs. FHYS
FSCC (Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF) and FHYS (Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSCC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Federated, while FHYS is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Federated. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FSCC returned 36.31% vs 4.84% for FHYS. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FSCC charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for FHYS.
Performance
FSCC vs. FHYS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSCC achieves a 17.26% return, which is significantly higher than FHYS's 1.69% return.
FSCC
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- 6M
- 12.18%
- YTD
- 17.26%
- 1Y
- 36.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.53%
FHYS
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- 6M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 1Y
- 4.84%
- 3Y*
- 7.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $243.03K | $357.29K | $377.47K | |
| $1.26M | $1.39M | $1.94M |
FSCC vs. FHYS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FSCC Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF | 17.26% | 15.30% | 2.15% |
FHYS Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF | 1.69% | 7.72% | 2.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSCC and FHYS is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2024 | 0.57 |
The correlation between FSCC and FHYS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSCC vs. FHYS — Risk / Return Rank
FSCC
FHYS
FSCC vs. FHYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) and Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF (FHYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSCC | FHYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.37 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 2.96 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.35 | 14.74 | -4.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSCC vs. FHYS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSCC drawdown since its inception was -27.17%, which is greater than FHYS's maximum drawdown of -11.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCC and FHYS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSCC | FHYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.17% | -11.62% | -15.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.07% | -1.66% | -9.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.73% | -0.39% | -5.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.98% | -2.21% | -2.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 0.33% | +2.88% |
Volatility
FSCC vs. FHYS - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) has a higher volatility of 4.48% compared to Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF (FHYS) at 0.65%. This indicates that FSCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHYS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSCC | FHYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.48% | 0.65% | +3.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.39% | 2.25% | +12.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.56% | 2.69% | +16.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.03% | 4.88% | +17.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.03% | 4.88% | +17.15% |
FSCC vs. FHYS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSCC has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than FHYS's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSCC vs. FHYS - Dividend Comparison
FSCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than FHYS's 5.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHYS Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF | 5.93% | 5.96% | 6.42% | 6.76% | 6.25% | 0.16% |
FSCC Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF | 0.23% | 0.27% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSCC and FHYS have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSCC has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to FHYS (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSCC dropped -27.17% vs FHYS's -11.62%.
On 1-year performance, FSCC leads with 36.31% vs 4.84% for FHYS. On fees, FSCC is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, FHYS has been the lower-risk option at 0.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FSCC has performed better with a 36.31% return vs 4.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FSCC is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for FHYS.
FHYS has the higher dividend yield at 5.93%, compared with 0.23% for FSCC.
FSCC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while FHYS is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for FSCC and 0.51% for FHYS.
FHYS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSCC and FHYS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer