FSCC vs. FDV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FSCC (Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF) and FDV (Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSCC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Federated, while FDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Federated. Both are actively managed. Their -0.26 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FSCC charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FDV.

Performance

FSCC vs. FDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) and Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FSCC

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: -3.22%
• 6M: 12.18%
• YTD: 17.26%
• 1Y: 36.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.53%

FDV

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 2.68%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF	$6.37M	$5.52M	$4.30M
FSCC Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF	$1.26M	$1.39M	$1.94M

FSCC vs. FDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FSCC Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF	2.68%
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF	5.51%

Correlation

The correlation between FSCC and FDV is -0.26, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2026	-0.26

FSCC vs. FDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FSCC	FDV
Financial Services	21.2%	14.4%
Healthcare	20.5%	14.7%
Industrials	14.6%	2.7%
Technology	13.3%	9.5%
Consumer Cyclical	8.0%	7.8%
Real Estate	7.4%	9.5%
Energy	4.6%	8.7%
Basic Materials	4.3%	1.4%
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	13.3%
Utilities	1.8%	16.1%
Communication Services	1.6%	1.8%

Return for Risk

FSCC vs. FDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSCC

FSCC Risk / Return Rank: 76
FSCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FSCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
FSCC Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FSCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FSCC Martin Ratio Rank: 79

FDV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSCC vs. FDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) and Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSCC	FDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.35	—	—

Drawdowns

FSCC vs. FDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSCC drawdown since its inception was -27.17%, which is greater than FDV's maximum drawdown of -3.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCC and FDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSCC	FDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.17%	-3.33%	-23.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.73%	-1.54%	-4.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.98%	-0.96%	-4.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.21%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FSCC	FDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.48%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.39%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.56%	13.81%	+5.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.03%	13.81%	+8.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.03%	13.81%	+8.22%

FSCC vs. FDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSCC has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than FDV's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSCC vs. FDV - Dividend Comparison

FSCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than FDV's 0.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF	0.78%	0.00%	0.00%
FSCC Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF	0.23%	0.27%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSCC and FDV in my portfolio?

FSCC and FDV have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FSCC or FDV?

On fees, FSCC is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FSCC or FDV?

FSCC is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FDV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FSCC or FDV?

FDV has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.23% for FSCC.

What is the main difference between FSCC and FDV?

FSCC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while FDV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for FSCC and 0.50% for FDV.