FSAVX vs. FSHOX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio (FSAVX) and Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio (FSHOX).
FSAVX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 29, 1986. FSHOX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 28, 1986.
Performance
FSAVX vs. FSHOX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSAVX vs. FSHOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSAVX Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio | -9.58% | 8.01% | 6.15% | 32.55% | -37.45% | 28.99% | 63.22% | 28.87% | -13.78% | 24.00% |
FSHOX Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio | -3.21% | 5.24% | 15.28% | 30.85% | -22.76% | 57.51% | 25.95% | 41.15% | -15.87% | 26.25% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSAVX achieves a -9.58% return, which is significantly lower than FSHOX's -3.21% return. Over the past 10 years, FSAVX has underperformed FSHOX with an annualized return of 9.76%, while FSHOX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.80% annualized return.
FSAVX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -10.65%
- YTD
- -9.58%
- 6M
- -17.80%
- 1Y
- 1.63%
- 3Y*
- 5.83%
- 5Y*
- 0.59%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
FSHOX
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -13.82%
- YTD
- -3.21%
- 6M
- -7.81%
- 1Y
- 8.36%
- 3Y*
- 13.51%
- 5Y*
- 9.42%
- 10Y*
- 13.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSAVX vs. FSHOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSAVX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than FSHOX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSAVX vs. FSHOX — Risk / Return Rank
FSAVX
FSHOX
FSAVX vs. FSHOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio (FSAVX) and Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio (FSHOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSAVX | FSHOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.10 | 0.44 | -0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.30 | 0.81 | -0.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.09 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 0.44 | -0.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.14 | 1.38 | -1.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSAVX | FSHOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 | 0.44 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | 0.44 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.62 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.56 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSAVX and FSHOX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSAVX vs. FSHOX - Dividend Comparison
FSAVX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSHOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSAVX Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.85% | 0.86% | 2.61% | 2.58% | 8.57% | 4.08% | 7.97% | 15.51% | 7.13% | 16.06% |
FSHOX Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio | 4.04% | 3.91% | 4.05% | 0.82% | 0.80% | 5.45% | 4.73% | 7.91% | 15.47% | 13.62% | 3.61% | 3.26% |
Drawdowns
FSAVX vs. FSHOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSAVX drawdown since its inception was -81.27%, which is greater than FSHOX's maximum drawdown of -61.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSAVX and FSHOX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSAVX | FSHOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.27% | -61.68% | -19.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.11% | -16.54% | -2.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.86% | -33.23% | -8.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.28% | -43.67% | +0.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.39% | -16.54% | -1.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.37% | -9.85% | -3.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.06% | 5.31% | +0.75% |
Volatility
FSAVX vs. FSHOX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio (FSAVX) and Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio (FSHOX) have volatilities of 6.68% and 6.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSAVX | FSHOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.68% | 6.83% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.68% | 13.61% | +2.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.87% | 21.59% | +1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.64% | 21.41% | +2.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.99% | 22.30% | +1.69% |