FSAVX vs. FSHOX
FSAVX (Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio) and FSHOX (Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FSAVX returned 10.56%/yr vs 14.26%/yr for FSHOX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSAVX charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for FSHOX.
Performance
FSAVX vs. FSHOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSAVX achieves a -5.41% return, which is significantly lower than FSHOX's 6.72% return. Over the past 10 years, FSAVX has underperformed FSHOX with an annualized return of 10.56%, while FSHOX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.26% annualized return.
FSAVX
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- 6M
- -9.43%
- YTD
- -5.41%
- 1Y
- -3.35%
- 3Y*
- 2.44%
- 5Y*
- -0.16%
- 10Y*
- 10.56%
FSHOX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- 6M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 6.72%
- 1Y
- 7.93%
- 3Y*
- 12.24%
- 5Y*
- 10.00%
- 10Y*
- 14.26%
FSAVX vs. FSHOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSAVX Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio | -5.41% | 8.01% | 6.15% | 32.55% | -37.45% | 28.99% | 63.22% | 28.87% | -13.78% | 24.00% |
FSHOX Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio | 6.72% | 5.24% | 15.28% | 30.85% | -22.76% | 57.51% | 25.95% | 41.15% | -15.87% | 26.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSAVX and FSHOX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 1986 | 0.72 |
The correlation between FSAVX and FSHOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSAVX vs. FSHOX — Risk / Return Rank
FSAVX
FSHOX
FSAVX vs. FSHOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio (FSAVX) and Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio (FSHOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSAVX | FSHOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.07 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 0.43 | -0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | 1.08 | -1.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSAVX vs. FSHOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSAVX drawdown since its inception was -81.27%, which is greater than FSHOX's maximum drawdown of -61.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSAVX and FSHOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSAVX | FSHOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.27% | -61.68% | -19.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.11% | -16.54% | -2.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.11% | -24.76% | +5.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.86% | -33.23% | -8.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.28% | -43.67% | +0.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.63% | -7.98% | -6.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.37% | -9.83% | -3.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.00% | 6.68% | +2.32% |
Volatility
FSAVX vs. FSHOX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio (FSAVX) is 6.10%, while Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio (FSHOX) has a volatility of 8.15%. This indicates that FSAVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSHOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSAVX | FSHOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 8.15% | -2.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.17% | 17.33% | -2.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.68% | 21.08% | -0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.83% | 21.95% | +1.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.87% | 22.56% | +1.31% |
FSAVX vs. FSHOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSAVX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than FSHOX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSAVX vs. FSHOX - Dividend Comparison
FSAVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.00%, which matches FSHOX's 6.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSAVX Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio | 6.00% | 0.00% | 0.85% | 0.86% | 2.61% | 2.58% | 8.57% | 4.08% | 7.97% | 15.51% | 7.13% | 16.06% |
FSHOX Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio | 6.04% | 3.91% | 4.05% | 0.82% | 0.80% | 5.45% | 4.73% | 7.91% | 15.47% | 13.62% | 3.61% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSAVX and FSHOX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSHOX has higher volatility (8.15%) compared to FSAVX (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSAVX dropped -81.27% vs FSHOX's -61.68%.
FSHOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.34 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSAVX and FSHOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer