FSAMX vs. FSPSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FSAMX (Strategic Advisers Emerging Markets Fund) and FSPSX (Fidelity International Index Fund) are both mutual funds - FSAMX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Fidelity, while FSPSX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Index. Over the past 10 years, FSAMX returned 11.34%/yr vs 9.45%/yr for FSPSX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSAMX charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FSPSX.

Performance

FSAMX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategic Advisers Emerging Markets Fund (FSAMX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSAMX achieves a 33.36% return, which is significantly higher than FSPSX's 9.51% return. Over the past 10 years, FSAMX has outperformed FSPSX with an annualized return of 11.34%, while FSPSX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.45% annualized return.

FSAMX

• 1D: 1.36%
• 1M: 11.70%
• YTD: 33.36%
• 6M: 36.63%
• 1Y: 64.62%
• 3Y*: 27.01%
• 5Y*: 8.90%
• 10Y*: 11.34%

FSPSX

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 4.06%
• YTD: 9.51%
• 6M: 12.14%
• 1Y: 22.52%
• 3Y*: 17.23%
• 5Y*: 8.91%
• 10Y*: 9.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSAMX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSAMX Strategic Advisers Emerging Markets Fund	33.36%	34.09%	8.34%	11.94%	-22.32%	-2.15%	20.39%	21.87%	-17.13%	38.40%
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund	9.51%	31.98%	3.70%	18.31%	-14.23%	11.45%	8.16%	22.03%	-13.55%	25.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FSAMX and FSPSX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011	0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between FSAMX and FSPSX has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FSAMX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSAMX

FSAMX Risk / Return Rank: 96
FSAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FSAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FSAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
FSAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FSAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

FSPSX

FSPSX Risk / Return Rank: 27
FSPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
FSPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
FSPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
FSPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
FSPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSAMX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers Emerging Markets Fund (FSAMX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSAMX	FSPSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.32	1.47	+2.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.38	2.10	+3.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.76	1.27	+0.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.17	1.91	+4.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	24.40	7.16	+17.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSAMX vs. FSPSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSAMX Sharpe Ratio is 4.32, which is higher than the FSPSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSAMX and FSPSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSAMX	FSPSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.32	1.47	+2.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	0.56	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	0.57	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.50	-0.14

Drawdowns

FSAMX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSAMX drawdown since its inception was -40.87%, which is greater than FSPSX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSAMX and FSPSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSAMX	FSPSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.87%	-33.69%	-7.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.04%	-11.39%	-1.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.77%	-13.58%	-3.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.64%	-29.41%	-9.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.87%	-33.69%	-7.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.45%	+0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.93%	-6.55%	-7.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.25%	3.03%	+0.22%

Volatility

FSAMX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison

Strategic Advisers Emerging Markets Fund (FSAMX) has a higher volatility of 7.52% compared to Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) at 4.62%. This indicates that FSAMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSAMX	FSPSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.52%	4.62%	+2.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.80%	12.04%	+3.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.67%	14.80%	+3.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.55%	15.98%	+1.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.97%	16.56%	+1.41%

FSAMX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSAMX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSAMX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison

FSAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, more than FSPSX's 2.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSAMX Strategic Advisers Emerging Markets Fund	4.64%	2.38%	2.53%	2.57%	2.64%	3.04%	0.99%	2.09%	1.67%	1.30%	1.22%	1.35%
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund	2.88%	3.15%	3.27%	2.79%	2.66%	3.07%	1.84%	3.18%	2.79%	2.50%	3.08%	2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSAMX and FSPSX in my portfolio?

FSAMX and FSPSX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSAMX or FSPSX?

FSAMX has higher volatility (7.52%) compared to FSPSX (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSAMX dropped -40.87% vs FSPSX's -33.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSAMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.32 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.