PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FSAMX vs. FGOMX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FSAMX and FGOMX is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.01.0

Performance

FSAMX vs. FGOMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategic Advisers Emerging Markets Fund (FSAMX) and Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FGOMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.84%
1.39%
FSAMX
FGOMX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FSAMX:

1.03

FGOMX:

1.07

Sortino Ratio

FSAMX:

1.51

FGOMX:

1.57

Omega Ratio

FSAMX:

1.19

FGOMX:

1.19

Calmar Ratio

FSAMX:

0.57

FGOMX:

0.61

Martin Ratio

FSAMX:

3.12

FGOMX:

3.28

Ulcer Index

FSAMX:

4.66%

FGOMX:

4.72%

Daily Std Dev

FSAMX:

14.12%

FGOMX:

14.38%

Max Drawdown

FSAMX:

-41.49%

FGOMX:

-41.75%

Current Drawdown

FSAMX:

-15.63%

FGOMX:

-14.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSAMX achieves a 4.18% return, which is significantly lower than FGOMX's 5.36% return.


FSAMX

YTD

4.18%

1M

3.80%

6M

0.83%

1Y

12.11%

5Y*

2.81%

10Y*

3.80%

FGOMX

YTD

5.36%

1M

4.93%

6M

1.39%

1Y

13.08%

5Y*

3.33%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FSAMX vs. FGOMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSAMX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than FGOMX's 0.25% expense ratio.


FSAMX
Strategic Advisers Emerging Markets Fund
Expense ratio chart for FSAMX: current value at 0.33% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.33%
Expense ratio chart for FGOMX: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FSAMX vs. FGOMX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSAMX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSAMX is 4444
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSAMX is 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSAMX is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSAMX is 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSAMX is 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSAMX is 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

FGOMX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FGOMX is 4646
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FGOMX is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FGOMX is 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FGOMX is 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FGOMX is 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FGOMX is 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FSAMX vs. FGOMX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers Emerging Markets Fund (FSAMX) and Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FGOMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FSAMX, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.031.07
The chart of Sortino ratio for FSAMX, currently valued at 1.51, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.511.57
The chart of Omega ratio for FSAMX, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.191.19
The chart of Calmar ratio for FSAMX, currently valued at 0.57, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.570.61
The chart of Martin ratio for FSAMX, currently valued at 3.12, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.003.123.28
FSAMX
FGOMX

The current FSAMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the FGOMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSAMX and FGOMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.03
1.07
FSAMX
FGOMX

Dividends

FSAMX vs. FGOMX - Dividend Comparison

FSAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, more than FGOMX's 2.28% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FSAMX
Strategic Advisers Emerging Markets Fund
2.43%2.53%2.57%2.64%1.98%0.99%2.09%1.67%1.27%1.16%1.35%1.60%
FGOMX
Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund
2.28%2.40%2.83%2.42%1.74%0.72%2.13%1.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FSAMX vs. FGOMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSAMX drawdown since its inception was -41.49%, roughly equal to the maximum FGOMX drawdown of -41.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSAMX and FGOMX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-22.00%-20.00%-18.00%-16.00%-14.00%-12.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-15.63%
-14.98%
FSAMX
FGOMX

Volatility

FSAMX vs. FGOMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Strategic Advisers Emerging Markets Fund (FSAMX) is 3.80%, while Strategic Advisers Fidelity Emerging Markets Fund (FGOMX) has a volatility of 4.13%. This indicates that FSAMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGOMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.80%
4.13%
FSAMX
FGOMX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab