PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRXT.L vs. FVUB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRXT.L vs. FVUB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF (FRXT.L) and Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF (FVUB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRXT.L achieves a 67.83% return, which is significantly higher than FVUB.L's 14.58% return.


FRXT.L

1D
-1.47%
1M
15.57%
YTD
67.83%
6M
73.29%
1Y
121.18%
3Y*
41.30%
5Y*
10Y*

FVUB.L

1D
-0.62%
1M
-9.72%
YTD
14.58%
6M
9.14%
1Y
36.63%
3Y*
10.68%
5Y*
7.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRXT.L vs. FVUB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FRXT.L
Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF
67.83%25.34%25.66%22.61%-17.25%
FVUB.L
Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF
14.58%35.51%-26.77%26.33%-5.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FRXT.L and FVUB.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2022

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRXT.L vs. FVUB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRXT.L
FRXT.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FRXT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRXT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRXT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FRXT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRXT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

FVUB.L
FVUB.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
FVUB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVUB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVUB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FVUB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVUB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRXT.L vs. FVUB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF (FRXT.L) and Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF (FVUB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRXT.LFVUB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.87

1.29

+0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

13.25

2.64

+10.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

38.41

8.35

+30.06

FRXT.L vs. FVUB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRXT.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.43, which is higher than the FVUB.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRXT.L and FVUB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRXT.LFVUB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.43

1.67

+3.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.28

-0.00

+1.28

Drawdowns

FRXT.L vs. FVUB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRXT.L drawdown since its inception was -28.86%, smaller than the maximum FVUB.L drawdown of -58.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRXT.L and FVUB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRXT.LFVUB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.86%

-58.22%

+29.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.09%

-13.83%

+4.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.86%

-27.50%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.57%

-13.83%

+12.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.95%

-27.79%

+20.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

4.38%

-1.24%

Volatility

FRXT.L vs. FVUB.L - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF (FRXT.L) has a higher volatility of 9.21% compared to Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF (FVUB.L) at 6.25%. This indicates that FRXT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FVUB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRXT.LFVUB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.21%

6.25%

+2.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.85%

18.17%

-0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.19%

21.79%

+0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.73%

25.57%

-4.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.73%

31.39%

-10.66%

FRXT.L vs. FVUB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FRXT.L and FVUB.L have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FRXT.L vs. FVUB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FRXT.L nor FVUB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FRXT.L and FVUB.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FRXT.L and FVUB.L have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.

FRXT.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while FVUB.L is Latin America Equities. FRXT.L tracks MSCI Taiwan NR USD, while FVUB.L tracks MSCI Brazil NR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRXT.L and FVUB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer