FRXT.L vs. FRIN.L
FRXT.L (Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF) and FRIN.L (Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from Franklin Templeton - FRXT.L tracks the MSCI Taiwan NR USD while FRIN.L tracks the MSCI India NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FRXT.L returned 41.30%/yr vs 3.96%/yr for FRIN.L. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.19% expense ratio.
Performance
FRXT.L vs. FRIN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRXT.L achieves a 67.83% return, which is significantly higher than FRIN.L's -10.53% return.
FRXT.L
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- 15.57%
- YTD
- 67.83%
- 6M
- 73.29%
- 1Y
- 121.18%
- 3Y*
- 41.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FRIN.L
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- YTD
- -10.53%
- 6M
- -10.61%
- 1Y
- -9.00%
- 3Y*
- 3.96%
- 5Y*
- 5.47%
- 10Y*
- —
FRXT.L vs. FRIN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRXT.L Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF | 67.83% | 25.34% | 25.66% | 22.61% | -17.25% |
FRIN.L Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF | -10.53% | -4.08% | 12.58% | 14.76% | 5.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRXT.L and FRIN.L is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2022 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRXT.L vs. FRIN.L — Risk / Return Rank
FRXT.L
FRIN.L
FRXT.L vs. FRIN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF (FRXT.L) and Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FRIN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRXT.L | FRIN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +6.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +6.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.87 | 0.91 | +0.96 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 13.25 | -0.50 | +13.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 38.41 | -1.14 | +39.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRXT.L | FRIN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.43 | -0.64 | +6.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.28 | 0.31 | +0.97 |
Drawdowns
FRXT.L vs. FRIN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRXT.L drawdown since its inception was -28.86%, smaller than the maximum FRIN.L drawdown of -36.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRXT.L and FRIN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRXT.L | FRIN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.86% | -36.20% | +7.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.09% | -17.95% | +8.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.86% | -22.37% | -6.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.57% | -18.75% | +17.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.95% | -7.14% | +0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 7.91% | -4.77% |
Volatility
FRXT.L vs. FRIN.L - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF (FRXT.L) has a higher volatility of 9.21% compared to Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FRIN.L) at 5.74%. This indicates that FRXT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRIN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRXT.L | FRIN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.21% | 5.74% | +3.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.85% | 11.82% | +6.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.19% | 14.04% | +8.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 15.52% | +5.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 19.41% | +1.32% |
FRXT.L vs. FRIN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FRXT.L and FRIN.L have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FRXT.L vs. FRIN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FRXT.L nor FRIN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FRXT.L and FRIN.L have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FRXT.L and FRIN.L have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.
FRXT.L tracks MSCI Taiwan NR USD, while FRIN.L tracks MSCI India NR USD.
Find the right allocation for FRXT.L and FRIN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer