FRXT.L vs. BATT.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FRXT.L (Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF) and BATT.L (L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FRXT.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan NR USD, while BATT.L is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FRXT.L returned 41.30%/yr vs 24.97%/yr for BATT.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FRXT.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for BATT.L.

Performance

FRXT.L vs. BATT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF (FRXT.L) and L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

FRXT.L is traded in GBP, while BATT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BATT.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRXT.L achieves a 67.83% return, which is significantly higher than BATT.L's 35.72% return.

FRXT.L

• 1D: -1.47%
• 1M: 15.57%
• YTD: 67.83%
• 6M: 73.29%
• 1Y: 121.18%
• 3Y*: 41.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BATT.L

• 1D: -2.55%
• 1M: -0.59%
• YTD: 35.72%
• 6M: 39.06%
• 1Y: 130.28%
• 3Y*: 24.97%
• 5Y*: 17.44%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRXT.L vs. BATT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FRXT.L Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF	67.83%	25.34%	25.66%	22.61%	-17.25%
BATT.L L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF	35.72%	59.22%	0.53%	3.36%	0.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FRXT.L and BATT.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2022	0.55

The correlation between FRXT.L and BATT.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FRXT.L vs. BATT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRXT.L

FRXT.L Risk / Return Rank: 97
FRXT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FRXT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
FRXT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 97
FRXT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FRXT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 96

BATT.L

BATT.L Risk / Return Rank: 95
BATT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
BATT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
BATT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 92
BATT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
BATT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRXT.L vs. BATT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF (FRXT.L) and L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FRXT.L	BATT.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.43	4.47	+0.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.12	4.85	+1.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.87	1.65	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	13.25	10.03	+3.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	38.41	34.79	+3.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FRXT.L vs. BATT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRXT.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.43, which is comparable to the BATT.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRXT.L and BATT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FRXT.L	BATT.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.43	4.47	+0.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.28	0.78	+0.50

Drawdowns

FRXT.L vs. BATT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRXT.L drawdown since its inception was -28.86%, smaller than the maximum BATT.L drawdown of -33.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRXT.L and BATT.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FRXT.L	BATT.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.86%	-33.29%	+4.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.09%	-12.91%	+3.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.86%	-33.29%	+4.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.57%	-4.28%	+2.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.95%	-8.89%	+1.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.14%	3.73%	-0.59%

Volatility

FRXT.L vs. BATT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF (FRXT.L) is 9.21%, while L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATT.L) has a volatility of 10.87%. This indicates that FRXT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FRXT.L	BATT.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.21%	10.87%	-1.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.85%	22.93%	-5.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.19%	28.95%	-6.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.73%	23.60%	-2.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.73%	23.55%	-2.82%

FRXT.L vs. BATT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRXT.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than BATT.L's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

FRXT.L vs. BATT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FRXT.L nor BATT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FRXT.L and BATT.L in my portfolio?

FRXT.L and BATT.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FRXT.L or BATT.L?

On fees, FRXT.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FRXT.L or BATT.L?

FRXT.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for BATT.L.

What is the main difference between FRXT.L and BATT.L?

FRXT.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while BATT.L is Alternative Energy Equities. FRXT.L tracks MSCI Taiwan NR USD, while BATT.L tracks Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FRXT.L and 0.49% for BATT.L.