PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRSGX vs. SBMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRSGX vs. SBMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (FRSGX) and ClearBridge Mid Cap Fund (SBMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRSGX achieves a 6.07% return, which is significantly higher than SBMAX's 4.25% return. Over the past 10 years, FRSGX has outperformed SBMAX with an annualized return of 14.62%, while SBMAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.52% annualized return.


FRSGX

1D
0.87%
1M
1.26%
YTD
6.07%
6M
4.01%
1Y
6.92%
3Y*
11.53%
5Y*
6.81%
10Y*
14.62%

SBMAX

1D
0.95%
1M
2.36%
YTD
4.25%
6M
2.70%
1Y
7.22%
3Y*
9.41%
5Y*
2.23%
10Y*
8.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRSGX vs. SBMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRSGX
Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund
6.07%2.83%11.36%27.20%-33.84%50.07%56.09%31.98%-4.94%21.64%
SBMAX
ClearBridge Mid Cap Fund
4.25%4.21%9.79%13.51%-25.19%28.37%16.25%32.77%-12.92%12.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FRSGX and SBMAX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 1998

0.92

The correlation between FRSGX and SBMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRSGX vs. SBMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRSGX
FRSGX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FRSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FRSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

SBMAX
SBMAX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
SBMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
SBMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRSGX vs. SBMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (FRSGX) and ClearBridge Mid Cap Fund (SBMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRSGXSBMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.09

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.46

0.62

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.40

1.86

-0.46

FRSGX vs. SBMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRSGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is comparable to the SBMAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRSGX and SBMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRSGX vs. SBMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRSGX drawdown since its inception was -69.07%, which is greater than SBMAX's maximum drawdown of -52.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRSGX and SBMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRSGXSBMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.07%

-52.41%

-16.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.39%

-10.32%

-2.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.77%

-23.62%

-2.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.25%

-31.55%

-7.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.25%

-39.88%

+0.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-1.37%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.67%

-9.65%

-9.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

3.46%

+0.58%

Volatility

FRSGX vs. SBMAX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (FRSGX) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to ClearBridge Mid Cap Fund (SBMAX) at 3.74%. This indicates that FRSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRSGXSBMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

3.74%

+2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.37%

11.36%

+2.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.71%

14.48%

+2.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.44%

19.84%

+8.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.08%

20.22%

+4.86%

FRSGX vs. SBMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRSGX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than SBMAX's 1.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRSGX vs. SBMAX - Dividend Comparison

FRSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.69%, less than SBMAX's 8.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRSGX
Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund
7.69%8.16%0.00%0.00%6.80%41.15%8.84%18.91%14.01%8.78%6.68%9.71%
SBMAX
ClearBridge Mid Cap Fund
8.56%8.92%8.73%1.83%4.96%12.79%7.27%7.78%4.52%6.52%1.70%5.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRSGX and SBMAX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRSGX has higher volatility (6.11%) compared to SBMAX (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRSGX dropped -69.07% vs SBMAX's -52.41%.

SBMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.45 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRSGX and SBMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer