PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRQIX vs. TBLYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRQIX vs. TBLYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2035 Fund (TBLYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRQIX achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly lower than TBLYX's 9.63% return.


FRQIX

1D
0.21%
1M
1.53%
YTD
4.05%
6M
4.28%
1Y
10.42%
3Y*
7.71%
5Y*
2.92%
10Y*
4.98%

TBLYX

1D
0.30%
1M
3.98%
YTD
9.63%
6M
10.22%
1Y
22.59%
3Y*
16.45%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRQIX vs. TBLYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FRQIX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I
4.05%9.97%4.48%8.52%-12.39%0.29%
TBLYX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2035 Fund
9.63%17.30%12.43%18.44%-17.17%4.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FRQIX and TBLYX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2021

0.77

The correlation between FRQIX and TBLYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRQIX vs. TBLYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRQIX
FRQIX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FRQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

TBLYX
TBLYX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
TBLYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBLYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBLYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
TBLYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBLYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRQIX vs. TBLYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2035 Fund (TBLYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRQIXTBLYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.44

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

2.93

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.08

12.98

+0.10

FRQIX vs. TBLYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRQIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the TBLYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRQIX and TBLYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRQIXTBLYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

2.34

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.64

-0.09

Drawdowns

FRQIX vs. TBLYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRQIX drawdown since its inception was -38.01%, which is greater than TBLYX's maximum drawdown of -24.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRQIX and TBLYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRQIXTBLYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.01%

-24.54%

-13.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.43%

-7.83%

+4.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.21%

-13.02%

+7.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.43%

-6.10%

+1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.80%

1.76%

-0.96%

Volatility

FRQIX vs. TBLYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX) is 1.66%, while T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2035 Fund (TBLYX) has a volatility of 2.98%. This indicates that FRQIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TBLYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRQIXTBLYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

2.98%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.42%

7.88%

-4.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.15%

9.81%

-5.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.57%

13.07%

-7.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.33%

13.07%

-7.74%

FRQIX vs. TBLYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRQIX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than TBLYX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRQIX vs. TBLYX - Dividend Comparison

FRQIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than TBLYX's 2.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRQIX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I
3.04%3.14%2.97%2.75%5.01%6.00%3.51%3.14%5.60%16.32%2.43%4.08%
TBLYX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2035 Fund
2.28%2.50%2.05%1.94%2.18%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRQIX and TBLYX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TBLYX has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to FRQIX (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRQIX dropped -38.01% vs TBLYX's -24.54%.

FRQIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRQIX and TBLYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer